80 pages printed
Non-le thal Weapons -- Terms & ReferencesDEMONS UNLEASHED, or ...
"Who'll be able to put this genie back in a bottle"?
* ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~
CODER'S NOTES :
To code this list of weapons, I had to read it in detail. I added a note where my (outrage and ) training in conflict and dispute analysis saw a >HOLE< in the data, where human rights violations and/or war crimes were insinuated. This document spells out the weapons the Shadow Government has, in its quivver, to keep ordinary people terrorized indefinitely. There is no exit strategy from civilian terror.
I note with dismay, the authors relate tools without discussing effects and outcomes. Depleted uranium armaments, the use of American soldiers as chemical reagent fodder; torture; nor videotaped sexual depravity--these are non-topics, except where it is noted that it's the Ulster Group of soldiers from the UK who developed the systematic torture that we are seeing in Bush's prisons.
Agent Orange and the Gulf War Syndrome are not itemized, nor are any disabilities that occur to our soldiers who are required to use these "non-lethal" weapons, noted.Nearly indifferent to ethical considerations of what is humane, decent, honorable and true to principles of "Just War, this "shopping list of misery" goes on to articulate the theory of war.
All the way down at the bottom of this treatise is their Theory of War, in which it is merely alluded to, that military and police are going to be combined and the United States dissolved. No mention is given to, whether that is an outcome that we the people have consented to. This is a morally-neutral Nazi document penned from the perspective of Federalists who espouse unitary dictatorship and nothing but capitulation for any "person" who dares dissent.. Indeed. protesters, BEWARE. These "non-lethal weapons are deadly.
Another matter missing from this list are the policies involved in construction of prison encampment facilities that have been placed in every state of this nation--which also are to be included, presumably, in "non-lethal" weapons. Yikes.--Editor, Chaiyah
* ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~ * ^ ~
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the US Government. This paper is approved for public release by OASD/PA and SAF/PAS (with the following disclaimer). Distribution is unlimited.
"Many of the Weap on concepts described in this paper are merely proposals. Except where specifically identified in official Department of Defense documents, none of the concepts in this paper should be interpreted to be funded R&D programs or operational Weap on systems possessed by the Department of Defense."
We believe you will find this reference book to be a useful addition to the current literature on nonle thal Weap ons. Its target audience is individuals who deal with special operations, Weap ons procurement and sales, and military operations other than war. It also complements other handbook literature of this type, such as Weap ons of Mass Destruction Terms Handbook (Alexandria, VA: Defense Special Weap ons Agency, May 1997), and Nuclear Terms Handbook 1996 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy, 1996). The need for such a handbook on nonle thal Weap ons and associated technology has grown along with the perception that U.S. forces will increasingly use such systems in the post-Cold War global security environment. We hope that this compre- hensive handbook will help to contribute a sense of the technological limitations of nonle thal Weap ons, as well as provide clarity and consistency in discussions on the future of U.S. national security policy.
INSS is primarily sponsored by the National Security Policy Division, Nuclear and CounterPro lifer ation Directorate, Headquarters US Air Force (USAF/XONP) and the Dean of the Faculty, US Air Force Academy. Our other current sponsors include: the Air Staff's Directorate for Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (USAF/XOI); OSD Net Assessment; the Defense Special Weap ons Agency; the Army Environmental Policy Institute; Army Space Command; and the On-Site Inspection Agency. The mission of the Institute is to promote national security research for the Department of Defense within the military academic community, and to support the Air Force national security education program. Its primary purpose is to promote research in fields of interest to INSS' sponsors: international security policy (especially arms control and counterPro lifer ation), Air Force planning issues, regional security policy, conflict in the information age (including the revolution in military affairs and information warfare), environmental security, and space policy.
INSS coordinates and focuses outside thinking in various disciplines and across services to develop new ideas for USAF policy making. The Institute develops topics, selects researchers from within the military academic community, and administers sponsored research. It also edits books and hosts conferences and workshops that facilitate the dissemination of information to a wide range of private and government organizations. INSS is in its fifth year of providing valuable, cost- effective research to meet the needs of the Air Staff and our other sponsors. We appreciate your continued interest in INSS and its research products. -- PETER L. HAYS, Lt Colonel,USAF, Director, Institute for NationalSecurity Studies.
| About the Editor | iii | Markers | 15 | |
| About the Contributors | iv | Obscurants | 15 | |
| Foreword | v | Opticals | 16 | |
| Executive Summary | ix | Projectiles | 19 | |
| Term Listing | 1 | Reactants | 22 | |
| I. Nonle thal Weap ons | 2 | Riot Control Agents | 23 | |
| Acoustics | 2 | Concepts | 27 | |
| Acoustics & Opticals | 3 | Ethics | 27 | |
| Antile thals | 4 | Functional | 28 | |
| Antiplant Agents | 6 | Operational | 29 | |
| Barriers | 7 | Physiological | 31 | |
| Batons | 9 | Theoretical | 32 | |
| Biotechnicals | 10 | Reference Listing | 34 | |
| Electricals | 11 | I. Books | 34 | |
| Electromagnetics | 13 | II. Chapters | 35 | |
| Entanglers | 13 | III. Documents | 36 | |
| Holograms | 15 | IV. Addenda | 79 |
The purpose of this paper is to promote an understanding of and research into a new category of Weap ons, designated "nonle thal" by the military services. These Weap ons are also classified as "less-than-le thal" or "less-le thal" by law enforcement agencies. National security experts consider these Weap ons increasingly important in the post-Cold War era. This type of Weap on has been used throughout history, but was given new emphasis during the Vietnam War era. Law enforcement agencies and Army national guard units relying upon traditional forms of politico-military force were ineffective in countering US domestic civil unrest. As similar types of conflict, now many magnitudes greater, seem to dominate international politics since the end of the Cold War, this type of Weap on takes on increasing importance.
The Department of Defense defines these Weap ons as follows:
Weap ons that are explicitly designed and primarily employed so as to incapacitate personnel or materiel,
while minimizing fatalities, permanent injury to personnel, and undesired damage to property and the
environment. Unlike conventional le thal Weap ons that destroy their targets principally through blast,
penetration and fragmentation, non- le thal Weap ons employ means other than gross physical destruction
to prevent the target from functioning. Non-le thal Weap ons are intended to have one, or both, of the
following characteristics: a. they have relatively reversible effects on personnel or materiel, b. they affect
objects differently within their area of influence [229:1-2].
We have followed this Western definition of nonle thal Weap ons in this paper, but have also included what would be considered non-Western forms of Weap onry. The reason for the inclusion of these Weap ons, which specifically are designed to result in permanent injury to personnel, is because of the great likelihood that they will be used against US forces in future conflicts.
Our intent is to create an initial term and reference listing that will help support joint-force and dual-use initiatives focused on identifying the potential drawbacks of integrating nonle thal Weap ons into our military services and law enforcement agencies. Because of the limited objective of this paper, it consists solely of two sections: a list of terms that describes nonle thal Weap ons along with the concepts both surrounding and inhibiting their use and a comprehensive listing of references to facilitate further research. The category of nonle thal Weap ons that offers the capability for information warfare has not been included in this paper because of its association with that distinct form of conflict.
The terms and descriptions provided within this paper should not be considered authoritative, static, or comprehensive. Rather, they represent a point of departure from which further research can be conducted and eventual definitions created as these Weap ons begin the slow and tedious process of being adapted for operational use. This paper offers a candid assessment of our current understanding of nonle thal Weap ons that undoubtedly contains inaccuracies, either directly or by omission.
Bearing these caveats in mind, we have attempted to create a fairly comprehensive overview of the terms and concepts relating to nonle thals and the works available for reference on this topic. The contributors to this paper represent some of our country's "best and brightest" in the field of nonle thal Weap ons research, development, training and operational employment. Their combined expertise spans the early years of the development of nonle thal Weap ons from the Vietnam War era, including their employment in the Somali operation and in recent domestic law enforcement disturbances, to newer systems still in the process of being developed and field tested.
Nonle thal Weap ons cannot be thought of in a "business as usual" sense or, for that matter, solely as a new type of force multiplier. It is the opinion of the editor (and most of the contributors to this paper) that when nonle thal Weap ons are ready for wide- scale application, this will signal a development as significant in magnitude as the emergence of gunpowder based firearms during the European Renaissance. Just as the firearm gave the ability for distance-killing that destroyed a Western ban existing since the time of the Iliad, the introduction of nonle thals may allow for tailored employment of politico-military force and challenge the accepted definition of warfare.
The US military will need to undertake significant organizational and doctrinal restructuring in order to exploit the potential of these new Weap ons. The most important near-term application of nonle thal technology appears to be in areas such as: operations in "failed states," as a counter to the non-Western form of warfare that is emerging globally, as a defense against the specter of further terrorist assaults upon our homeland, and as a means of responding to civil unrest in many of our inner cities. Over the longer term, it is their fit with other nascent warfighting trends embodied in the revolution in political and military affairs (RPMA) that is of paramount significance. For example, nonle thal Weap ons could present new and potentially highly effective mechanisms for dealing with an advanced form of battle- space (i.e. cyberspace) and the criminally-based non-state soldier (i.e. terrorist, mercenary or "new- warrior class") as a challenger to the Western nation-state's domination of political violence.
In order to respond to these and other challenges, we must insure that our armed services retain the capability to dominate the battlefields of the 21st century. Our ability to use nonle thal Weap ons effectively will be a critical component of our future capabilities. It is toward improving our knowledge in that endeavor that this paper has been written. --- Robert J. Bunker, December 1996
As listed in the table of contents, the entries in this paper are organized into seventeen categories for nonle thal Weap ons technology and five areas for concepts associated with the use of nonle thal technology. The citation protocol for entries list the reference material number and the page number as follows: [Reference Number: Page Number]. If an entire document is cited, no page numbers are given. For the purpose of accuracy, many terms have been directly quoted from a single referenced source, while others combined reference sources.
A. Acoustics
Acoustic Beam . High power, very low frequency beam emitted from Weap onry under development. Envisioned to be a piston-driven or detonation-driven pulser which forces compressed air into tubes to generate a low frequency wave [543,546].
Acoustic, Blast Wave, Projector. Energy generation from a pulsed laser that will project a hot, high pressure plasma in the air in front of a target. It creates a blast wave with variable but controlled effects on hardware and troops [543].
Acoustic Bullets . High power, very low frequency waves emitted from one to two meter antenna dishes. Results in blunt object trauma from waves generated in front of the target. Effects range from discomfort to death. A Russian device that can propel a 10-hertz sonic bullet the size of a baseball hundreds of yards is thought to exist. Proposed fixed site defense [16,113,212,543]. Also known as sonic bullets.
Acoustic, Curdler Unit . A device which is plugged into an HPS-1 sound system to produce a shrill shrieking, blatting noise. It is used to irritate and disperse rioters and had a decibel range just below that of the danger level to the human ear. It is used in night operations to produce a "voodoo" effect and effectively breaks up chanting, singing and clapping [2:279- 280,82:184,84,529].
Acoustic, Deference Tones . Devices which can project a voice or other sound to a particular location. The resulting sound can only be heard at that location [176:86].
Acoustic, Doppler Effect Alarm . Any movement in the area between a transmitter and a receiver causes a slight variation in the sound pattern received. By measuring this variation an alarm system can be made to be activated [23:204].
Acoustic, High Intensity Sound . Loud music was used by American forces to drive Manual Norriega from the Vatican Embassy in Panama in 1990. Also known as polysound [354:45].
Acoustic, HPS-1 Sound System . A 350 watt sound system with an audible voice range of 2 1/2 miles. Used by the military in Indo-China and then supplied to law enforcement. First used by police forces at San Francisco State College and at Berkeley in the 1960s [2:277-279,82,84]. See also Acoustic, Curdler Unit.
Acoustic, Infrasound . Very low- frequency sound which can travel long distances and easily penetrate most buildings and vehicles. Transmission of long wavelength sound creates biophysical effects; nausea, loss of bowels, disorientation, vomiting, potential internal organ damage or death may occur. Superior to ultrasound because it is "in band" meaning that its does not lose its properties when it changes mediums such as from air to tissue. By 1972 an infrasound generator had been built in France which generated waves at 7 hertz. When activated it made the people in range sick for hours [23,302,546].
Acoustic, Squawk Box . Crowd dispersal Weap on field tested by the British Army in Ireland in 1973. This directional device emits two ultrasonic frequencies which when mixed in the human ear become intolerable. It produces giddiness, nausea or fainting. The beam is so small that is can be directed at specific individuals in a riot situation [451,452,504].
Acoustic, Teleshot . Cartridge projecting a powerful sonic device delivered by a 12-gauge shotgun. Experimental use in 1972 [529].
Acoustic, Ultrasound. A very high frequency sound whose wavelength is "out of band" making it less effective than infrasound because it losses its properties when it changes mediums. Example, from air to human tissue. Like infrasound a lot of power is required to generate these waves which create biophysical effects. See also Acoustic, Infrasound.
B. Acoustics & Opticals
Acoustic & Optical, Air Burst Simulator . A diversionary device normally used to simulate the air burst of artillery rounds during infantry training. The device is fired via a 37- 40mm launching device and has an 8 second fuze prior to ignition.
Acoustic & Optical, Cod-Weight . A heavy, (2 pounds or greater) weight to which a diversionary device is attached to allow it to be thrown through window screens, window glass, bushes and similar materials. The name is derived from the original weights used for deep-sea fishing for Cod.
Acoustic & Optical, Diversionary Device . A hand thrown pyrotechnic device which emits a loud bang and dazzling light when ignited. The device is designed to create a sensory overload which temporarily causes confusion and an inability to effectively respond to a tactical team's actions. Sometimes called a flash-bang grenade.
Acoustic & Optical, Diversionary Device, Launched. A diversionary device which can be launched from a 12 gauge shot gun [373].
Acoustic & Optical, Flash Stick . A stick or pole to which a diversionary device is affixed, allowing it to be precisely placed and held during ignition. Often used for exact insertion through chain link fences, windows, heavy brush and so forth.
Acoustic & Optical, Painter's Pole . An extendible pole to which a diversionary device is affixed allowing it to be precisely placed and held during ignition. Often used for supporting second story entries from beneath. The name is derived from the pole used by painters to hold paint rollers when painting overhead.
Acoustic & Optical, Photic Driver . A crowd control device developed by a British company prior to 1973 which uses ultrasound and flashing infrared lights which penetrate closed human eyelids. Potential for epileptic fits because of the stroboscopic flashing effect. May have been employed by South African Police during interrogations [23,450].
Acoustic & Optical, Psycho-Correction . A technology invented by a Russian scientist that involves influencing subjects visually or aurally with imbedded subliminal messages [318].
Acoustic & Optical, Stun Grenade. A non-le thal grenade, XM84, in development to be used by Army military police [338].
C. Antile thals : Technologies which provide counter-sniper, counter-mortar, antimissile and high- precision Weap ons capabilities. Advanced forms of camouflage and sensors which defeat le thal Weap ons are additional forms of this technology [418:24].
Antile thal, Camouflage-Active . Created by dynamically matching the object to be camouflaged to its background colors and light levels rendering it virtually invisible to the eye. This is conceptually the same camouflage process as that used by a chameleon. This is accomplished through a sophis- ticated color and light sensor array which detects an object's background color and brightness. This data is then computer matched and reproduced on a pixel array covering the viewing service of the object to be camouflaged. Also known as chameleon camouflage [245,302].
Antile thal, Camouflage-Metamorphic . Uniforms or paint which change color due to either light or heat sensitivity. Extremely useful for night and day operations and those taking place in urban environments [245,302].
Antile thal Counter- Sniper. Electronic sniper-locating systems based on acoustic, shock wave or infrared measuring technologies. Provides the location of a hostile sniper to a sniper team or to an automated counter-sniper system which can fire either a kinetic round or a low-energy laser at the hostile sniper [2:300-301,505].
Antile thal, Electronic-False Target Generation . An electronic device that creates and presents an image of a target to a precision laser-guided Weap on that causes that Weap on to aim at the false target. Used as a countermeasure to those precision guided Weap ons [468:14].
Antile thal, Electronic-Shell Detonator . A system fielded by U.S. troops in Bosnia which creates an electronic field that causes mortar and artillery shells to explode prematurely by signaling to them that they have reached their target [183].
Antile thal, Electromagnetic Shielding . A form of defense against microwave attack. A metal box, known as a "Faraday Cage," can sometimes function as one by excluding electromagnetic fields [356:39].
Antile thal, Food Bomb. Humanitarian use of nonle thal Weap ons. Place concentrated food pellets rather than anti-personnel bomblets in a cluster bomb unit. For use in cities under siege on the verge of starvation [609].
Antile thal, Laser Protection . Protection is achieved in three ways: absorption using dyes, reflected using optical coatings and the blocking of specific wavelengths [287].
Antile thal, Laser Protection-BLPS.
Ballistic and Laser Protective Spectacles. Since 1988, these devices have been issued to high priority Army and Marine Corps units. The BLPS are dye-filled polycarbonate plastic filters which will protect eyesight against the low-energy lasers most likely encountered on today's battlefield, specifically the two or three wave lengths used by common range finders and target designators based on Nd:YAG and ruby lasers. They will not give protection against frequency- agile low energy laser Weap ons [1:185].
Antile thal, Laser Protection-Smoke . Smoke's attenuative properties allow it to serve as a passive defense against blinding laser Weap onry. Large-area smoke generation may provide a means to offer continuous protection for forward elements of U.S. com bat forces [115:38].
Antile thal, Low Energy Laser. An Air Force project, known as Have Glance, in which a pod-mounted, low energy laser would be mounted on an aircraft to confuse the heat-seeking function of infrared missiles [1:161].
Antile thal, RPG Barrier . See Barrier, Fence-RPG.
Antile thal, Sensor-Acoustic. Remote acoustic sensors placed in an area overwatch position in urban zones to detect and locate gunfire within that area [429].
Antile thal, Sensor-Facial Recognition Technology . Experimental information systems which recognize human facial features and compare them to databases of wanted suspects. Great potential for apprehending terrorists in airport terminals and criminals in large crowds. More advanced subdermal systems will be required as a follow-on to these systems as a counter to criminals/non-state soldiers who surgically alter their facial features [642].
Antile thal, Sensor-Ground Penetrating Radar . Sensor that can detect nongeologic objects and human engineered structures beneath the ground by analyzing the return of electromagnetic waves traveling through geologic structures. Detection of buried mines and discovery/mapping of underground bunkers represent practical, nonle thal applications [215:10].
Antile thal, Sensor-Nonimaging Portable Radar . A radar unit which weighs less than 10 pounds, uses rechargeable batteries, is small enough to fit into a briefcase and will detect motion through nonmetallic walls and floors. Using sounds instead of images, it detects motion and can transmit to a receiver up to a distance of 200 feet [302].
Antile thal, Sensor-Retroreflectivity . A theory based on the reflection of light. Common example is seeing an animal's eyes at night in your headlights. Allows for an electro- optical sensing mode that can be used to find opposing electroptics looking into the night for location and targeting purposes.
Antile thal, Smart Gun . A gun which can only be used by the proper user or users. Identification is automatic and would be carried out by radio frequency signals or other technologies [620].
Antile thal, Smart Metals. See Markers, Smart Metals.
Antile thal, White Light Goggles . Experimental goggles which "gate out" bright white light so that the user will not be affected by them along with the targets [330:6].
D. Antiplant Agents
Antiplant Agent . Compounds used to destroy plants or crops function in one of two general ways. Growth regulators and desiccants kill or defoliate by stimulating the leaf fall process (growth regulator) or by drying the leaf blade (desiccant). The other category, soil sterilizers, contaminate the soil, preventing or retarding growth. Uses of antiplant agents include destruction of crops and foliant removal to deny/ degrade camouflage [13:77-78].
Antiplant Agent Blue . Fast acting antiplant desiccant containing sodium dimethyl. The desiccant, unlike anti- plant growth regulators, works by drying the leaf blade of the plant rather than simulating the plant's leaf fall process [13:77-78].
Antiplant Agent, Defoliants . Any of a variety of chemical compounds that either stimulate the leaf fall process, dry the leaf blade or sterilize the soil [13:77-78].
Antiplant Agent, Operation Ranch Hand . A defoliation program conducted during the Vietnam War from 1962 to 1970. The primary purpose of the operation was to deny cover to enemy forces, thereby making ambushes more difficult. Crop destruction missions were also conducted in northern and eastern central areas of South Vietnam [22:66-67].
Antiplant Agent Orange . Antiplant growth regulator containing n-butyl esters of dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and trichlorophenoyacetic acid. Publicized for its use in Operation Ranch Hand in the Vietnam War from 1962-1970 [13:77-78]. [NOTE: TOXIC TO US FORCES.--Ed]
Antiplant Agent Purple . Growth regulator similar to Agent Orange but contains, in addition, the isobutyl ester of trichlorophenoxyacetic acid [13:77-78].
Antiplant Agent White . Antiplant growth regulator composed of a mixture of tri-iso-propanolanime salt of dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and picloram in water [13:77-78].
E. Barriers
Barrier, Air Bag, Backseat. An automobile airbag designed to hold in place a suspect placed in a police car. Designed because of the frequency of violent behavior once suspects have been handcuffed and placed in a police car for transport.
Barrier, Air Bag Mine . A nonle thal vehicular mine based on a type of air bag [339].
Barrier, Caltrops . A personnel and vehicular barrier device with four projecting spikes so arranged that when three of the spikes are on the ground, the fourth points upward. The term caltrop is derived from an English water chestnut which was used to impede the mobility of heavy cavalry during the Middle Ages. Caltrops were used in Somalia by the Marines during United Shield to supplement key barrier systems at night during the final hours of the withdrawal [378].
Barrier, Coating-Slick . Teflon- type lubricants which create a slippery surface because of their chemical properties. These chemical agents reduce friction with the intent to inhibit the free movement of the target. In the 1960s the term "Instant Banana Peel" was coined to describe the capability provided by Riotril. When applied to a hard surface and wetted down, this dry, relatively-inexpensive, non-toxic, non-corrosive white powder becomes ice slick. It becomes virtually impossible for an individual to move or stand up on a hard surface so treated. Tire-type vehicles are also unable to get traction. Riotril, if allowed to dry, can easily be peeled away or, because of its water-soluble nature, can also be hosed away with high-pressure streams [2:302-303,16,91, 356,565]. Also known as low- friction polymers, slick'ems,' and superlubricants.
Barrier, Coating-Sticky . Polymer adhesives used to bond down equipment and human targets. Also known as stick'ems' and superadhesives [16].
Barrier , Electronic. See Antile thal, Electronic-Shell Detonator.
Barrier, Emulsifier . Agents, contained in a mixture of mutually insoluble liquids, which were dispersed over the Ho Chi Minh trail to degrade the logistical lifeline of Viet Cong forces during the Vietnam War. Used in tandem with clouding seeding. Also known as soil destabilizers [434].
Barrier, Fence-Electrical . See Electrical, Fence.
Barrier, Fence-RPG. Conventional fencing, usually 6 ft high, with barbed wire on top. While the anti- mobility utility of such fencing is apparent it also had an anti-le thal capability. In Vietnam this fencing was erected as a rocket propelled grenade (RPG) screen in front of armored fighting positions and around command vehicles. RPGs which hit this screen either had their fusing systems disabled (RPG7's) or prematurely detonated (RPG2's). Also known as cyclone fencing [635,637:109].
Barrier, Foam-Aqueous . Originally derived from a fire fighting compound used to put out airplane fires. Barrier foam is a derivative which is thicker in consistency. This technology employs a safe, bio- degradable form of suds which can be piled up to as high as four feet. Barrier foam can be applied over fences, concertina wire, ditches to be seeded with caltrops (a four pointed device designed to puncture tires) to prevent vehicular passage. By applying the foam over obstacles, it impedes the ability to defeat them. Barrier foam, as its name implies, is used to deny entry or passage. The conceptual origins of this foam date back to 1965 [2:300,82,302,378].
Barrier, Foam-Aqueous, Generator . Concept involves blowing air through nylon net kept wet with mixture which creates aqueous foam [529].
Barrier, Foam-Aqueous Riot Control Agent . The ordinary suds of barrier foam can be enhanced with the addition of substances such as oleoresin capsicum, the primary ingredient in "pepper spray," or CS [165].
Barrier, Foam-Sticky . A name given to a polymer-based superadhesive agent. The technology first began appearing in commercial applications such as "super glue" and quick setting foam insulation. It is extremely persistent and is virtually impossible to remove without a liquid solvent which has a pleasant citrus odor. The solvent can be applied as a spray or poured on. The foam then appears to dissipate, releasing its hold and allowing suspects to be arrested and safely transported. Sticky foam came to public attention on February 28, 1995 when U.S. Marines used it in Mogadishu, Somalia, to prevent armed intruders from impeding efforts to extricate United Nation forces from that county [302,378].
Barrier, Foam-Sticky , Dispenser. An interior barrier system, operated by either intruder penetration or command, which administers a sticky-foam barrier in a passageway from floor to ceiling [506].
Barrier, Rope, Launcher . Nylon rope dispersed by a compressed air launcher using mounted on a truck. Thirty cubic feet per minute [529].
Barrier, Smoke-Antilaser . See Antile thal, Laser Protection-Smoke.
Barrier, Smoke-Cold. A thick, disorienting "cold smoke" which can be generated in areas from 2,000 to 50,000 cubic feet. It restricts an intruders eye-hand coordination and interactions among members of an intruding group [506].
Barrier, Spike . An angle-cut metal rod driven into an unsurfaced road's wheel pit. A 1/2 inch diameter rod, protruding only about 3 inches, is blunt enough so as to not penetrate a shoe sole under a person's weight, yet a heavy vehicle will drive it through a tire [15:92].
Barrier, Spiked Strip . Flat strip resembling a fire hose with retractable hollow spikes designed to flatten the tires of a target automobile. When the strip is activated, hollow spikes extend vertically and puncture the tires as the vehicle rolls over the strip.Also known as road spikes [566:2].
Barrier, Stakes . A sharp stake, often of wood or bamboo, that is concealed in high grass, deep mud or pits. It is often coated with excrement, and intended to wound and infect the feet of enemy soldiers. Can be utilized both as a booby trap and as a barrier. Commonly known as punji stick or punji stakes.
Barrier, Wire/Tape-Barbed, Launcher . Dispensing systems for flat barbed tape and barbed wire which could be quickly deployed into concertina form [82,529].
F. Batons
Baton, Biotechnical-Injector. A baton with an automatic self-injecting syringe for administering the antidote to nerve gas built into it's tip and filled with calmatives or other biotechnical agents [165].
Baton, Breakaway . A baton made of a substance that will break if used incorrectly [529].
Baton, Electrical . Standard dimension baton which delivers an electric charge of low voltage, powered by standard flash-light cells [2:240,23,529]. Also known as stun baton or shok baton.
Baton, Expandable . Measures 6" to 7" in closed position. The three telescopic sections rapidly flick open to an extended 16" to 18". Also known as extensible billyclub [529].
Baton, Riot Control Agent . 12- 26" plastic baton which is able to project riot control agents [2:211- 212].
Baton, Side-Handle . A baton with a side-handle attachment which allows it to be twirled for greater impact and used more effectively to block an opponent's blows.
Baton, Straight . Wooden, plastic, metallic rod from 12" to 36" used as a swung impact Weap on. Can either hang from a leather throng or be held in a holster. Smaller version, 6" to 8." Also known as nightstick or billyclub.
Baton, Straight, Flashlight . Heavy shock resistant flash light which can be swung like a baton.
Baton, Straight, Flashlight-Riot Control Agent. Shock resistance polyethylene flash light. Besides providing a light source, this flashlight can be used as a baton and to project a riot control agent [2:216].
Baton, Two-Handed Riot . The 36 in. long riot baton is employed like a rifle and bayonet--overhead blows could be fatal. Short, one-handed batons are not appropriate for close- quarter riot actions [74,95].
G. Biotechnicals
Biotechnical, Behavior-Altering Drugs . See Biotechnical, Calmatives. Suggested delivery in a gaseous form for terrorist and hostage situations in 1987 [556].
Biotechnical, Biodegrading Microbes. Microbes which turn storage tanks full of aviation fuel into useless jelly. Such microbes may produce acids or enzymes which can be tailored to degrade almost anything, even concrete and metal, so their potential use as nonle thal Weap ons could be extensive [171:2,356:38].
Biotechnical, Calmatives . Biotechnical agents which are sedatives or sleep-inducing drugs; includes alfentinil, fentanyls, ketamine and BZ. Several of them make ideal choices for this application when mixed with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which promotes absorption through skin to quickly sedate persons contacted. DMSO introduces the calmative agent into the bloodstream by increasing the epidermal absorption rate by about 1,000 percent. The explosion of a flash bang (sometimes called a diversionary device) represents one method of dispersing DMSO and a calmative agent. Calmatives were reportedly used by the Soviets against the Mujahideen in Afghanistan [16,176:83,302,431,556].Also known as sleep agents.
Biotechnical, Disease Organisms . Nonfatal diseases targeted toward troops and civilians. Such viral agents were developed by Iraq to be used against Western forces during the Gulf War so as to create long term disabling injuries. Agents being considered for use were those that cause hemorrhagic conjunctivitis, chronic diarrhea, yellow fever and Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever [627]. [HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE.--Ed.]
Biotechnical, DM. Diphenylaminechloroarsine. A sickening agent no longer in use by the military because of health risks. Probably ruled out of use in Vietnam by October, 1965. Effects include sneezing, shortness of breath, retching and vomiting, hemorrhaging, and possible death. Mixed with CN for immediate effect [13:19,529]. [HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE.--Ed.]
Biotechnical, Genetic Alteration . The act of changing genetic code to create a desired less-than- le thal but longterm disablement effect, perhaps for generations, thereby creating a societal burden. [HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE --Ed.]
Biotechnical, Hypodermic Syringe-Dart . Modified shotgun or handgun in which the projectile is a drug- filled syringe activated by a small charge on impact. Wide variety of drugs available including emetic (vomiting) agents [2:293,165,529].
Biotechnical, Injector-Baton. See Baton, Biotechnology-Injector.
Biotechnical, Malodorous Agents. Foul-smelling gases and sprays such as hydrogen sulphide (H2S) or a compound known as NaS8 which is used in making plastics. Could be delivered by a grenade. Past work on "cultural specific" agents has also been undertaken [356,529]. See also Biotechnical, Project Agile.
Biotechnical, Neuro-Implant . Computer implants into the brain which allow for behavioral modifica- tion and control. Current research is experimental in nature and focuses on lab animals such as mice [636]. [HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSE --Ed.]
Biotechnical, Pheromones. The chemical substances released by animals to influence physiology or behavior of other members of the same species. One use of pheromones, at the most elemental level, could be to mark target individuals and then release bees to attack them. This would result in forcing them to exit an area or abandon resistance [195].
Biotechnical, Project Agile. Series of military science studies in Asia conducted by Battele Memorial Institute in May 1966 for Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA). One such study centered on developing 'stink' bombs which were race specific [320].
Biotechnical, Wetware. Advanced technology devices which are surgically implanted into the body rather than worn. These devices can be used to enhance memory and the human senses, modify behavior or to locate allied troops. Pacemakers represent an early form of wetware. New concept developed in this document.
H. Electricals
Electrical , Armored Personnel Carrier. Standard armored personnel carrier fitted with a gate-like apparatus in the front and charged to a high voltage. Used by West German police to clear streets or round up small groups of people [165].
Electrical, Baton . See Baton, Electrical.
Electrical, Fence .A fence which delivers a nonle thal electrical shock. It can be employed as an effective barrier against intruders [74:66].
Electrical, Flashlight . A type of flashlight designed with electrodes on the base. Effective range is minimal [556].
Electrical, Glove . A glove with an electric impulse generator in the palm and the bottom sides of the glove fingers. A close-in device similar to the electric stun gun and the electric flashlight [556].
Electrical, High-Voltage Telsa Coil. Passed from public scene because of their indiscriminate use against blacks in several Southern states in the mid-1960s. Example, electric baton or electric cattle prod [165].
Electrical, Homemade Body Armor . Newspapers and magazines stuffed down inmates' clothing and/or the use of mattresses as shields to counter the effects of stun guns [385].
Electrical, Police Jacket . Police jacket which jolts anyone who touches it [165].
Electrical, Projector . An advanced version of the standoff stun gun, where no wires are required. The charges are delivered through the air through pre-ionized air channels or by charging a low energy projectile which releases the charge at impact. Another approach is to launch a low energy projectile that releases the electrical charge at impact by compressing a piezo-electric element [195:8].
Electrical, Stun Belt . A command activated belt worn by prisoners which delivers a mild electric shock when they become com bative [385]. [HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION.--Ed.]
Electrical, Stun Gun -Close In. A small, two-pronged, hand held electrical discharge Weap on. Effective range is less than an arm length. It works by affecting the muscle signal paths, disturbing the nerve system [556].
Electrical, Stun Gun-Standoff . A form of stun gun with a range of 20 feet. It fires small, barbed electrical contactors, via a fine trailing wire, which snare a victim's clothing. A 3- 4 second lapse takes place before the target is subdued. The development of this device was inspired by the Watts Riots in 1965 [408,529].
Electrical, Water Stream . A mobile unit projects a water stream charged with high voltage, low amperage. Another method cites 2 water jets, 1 negatively charged and 1 positively charged, which meet to close the circuit [529].
I. Electromagnetics
Electromagnetic, Engine Kill . The use of high-powered microwaves to kill the electrical system of an engine.
Electromagnetic, High Power Microwave [HPM] , Weap ons. Energy generated by a conventional electromagnetic apparatus, such as a radar transmitter, or released from a conventional explosion converted into a radio-frequency Weap on which causes the disruption of electronic systems. Usually an ultra-wide ban source focus due to target vulnerability considerations. HPMs can also cause human unconsciousness without permanent maiming by upsetting the neural pathways in the brain and/or death [256,278].
Electromagnetic, Interference (EMI) . Flight control systems of military aircraft are sensitive to electromagnetic interference (EMI). It is suspected that several crashes of Army UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters may have resulted when they flew too near large microwave transmitters [278].
Electromagnetic, Maser . Microwave Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. A microwave generation device [that targets individuals' brain patterns off a gps, without their knowledge. WAR CRIME. --Ed.]
Electromagnetic Pulse, Non-Nuclear [NNEMP], Weap ons . Non-nuclear EMP generating Weap ons mounted on cruise missiles or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) which would disable enemy tanks and early warning radars would be invaluable. Such Weap ons when they explode would produce a momentary burst of microwaves powerful enough to disable all but special, radiation-hardened electronic devices [205,261,262].
Electromagnetic, Radio Frequency [RF], Weap ons . A class of Weap ons which transmit short, high-powered pulses of electromagnetic radiation over significant ranges [278].
Electromagnetic, Rocket-Powered Unit. Unmanned miniature-wheeled vehicle launched by a police cruiser which delivers an electromagnetic energy pulse to the underside of a fleeing car's engine controls and associated sensors to disable it [644:4].
Electromagnetic, Static Unit. See Electromagnetic, Rocket-Powered Unit. Static version resembling a pancake shaped bump in the road. Remote control or unmanned automatic control [644:4].
Electromagnetic, Thermal Gun . A device that directs energy to produce heat, in concept similar to a microwave oven [565].
J. Entanglers
Entangler, Animal "Come-Along". A pole with a looped wire attached to one end. When the wire is placed around the neck of a subject and then tightened it produces a choking effect much in the same manner as that of a choking collar used for dogs.
Entangler, Bola . Device consisting of two or three heavy balls attached by one or two ropes/ cords and used for entanglement purposes. It is twirled overhead in one hand and hurled or cast at the intended target. Designed to entangle legs to retard/stop movement. Probably an ancient Weap on, but made famous by the gauchos of South America, who used them to catch cattle and ostrich.
Entangler, Cloggers . Polymer agents, sticky-soft plastics, used in burst munitions to clog up jet and tank engine intakes [144].
Entangler, Cloggers-Colored. Clogging agents when mixed with dyes result in "tinted clouds" whose presence let friendly forces know not to enter them [353].
Entangler, Cloggers-Colored, Mine-Air. Cloggers mixed with colored gas which designate an air mine to allied pilots or drones. These air mines can be intermixed with "decoy mines" consisting solely of colored gas and laid in air mine fields to restrict aerial mobility [54].
Entangler, Monofilament Fishing Line . When spread out on snow, monofilament fishing line may be sucked into a snowmobile's track mechanism and cause it to jam. Effectiveness unconfirmed [15:108].
Entangler, Net-Electrified. A net shot from a gun at a targeted individual. Will release an electric shock if the target tries to struggle [361:69].
Entangler, Net, Gun . Fires a net which entangles a human or vehicular target. One such net is 18 feet wide and employs glue-coated strands. Another is 28-foot-wide, fired from a cannon and can envelope a car or armored vehicle [121:24,165].
Entangler, Net, Mine-Human . Mine detonation fires a net into the air which lands upon a soldier target.
Entangler, Net, Mine-Vehicular . A device laid across a road which shoots a fabric barrier up about to 2 meters to ensnare an oncoming vehicle [216].
Entangler, Net - Poles. A capture device based on a pair of 6 foot nylon poles that have a strong chain interlaced between them. It is employed by two people who capture the target in the chain mesh between the poles [2:295,569:21].
Entangler, Riot Gloves . Heavy protective gloves used by prison guards and riot police which protect the hands and forearms from cuts and blunt trauma. These gloves allow for the grappling of prisoners and rioters.
K. Holograms
Hologram . Hologram used to scare a target individual to death. Example, a drug lord with a weak heart sees the ghost of his dead rival appearing at his bedside and dies of fright [149:4].
Hologram, Prophet . The projection of the image of an ancient god over an enemy capitol whose public communications have been seized and used against it in a massive psychological operation [609].
Hologram, Soldiers-Forces . The projection of soldier-force images which make an opponent think more allied forces exist than actually do, make an opponent believe that allied forces are located in a region where none actually exist, and/or provide false targets for his Weap ons to fire upon. New concept developed in this document.
L. Markers
Marker, Foam Dye. Hand held device which is used to spray green foaming dye into the face of an opponent. Obscures vision and marks the target for one week for future identification.
Marker, Invisible. One concept envisions a fluorescent powder sprayed into crowds from pressurized container. Particles adhere to clothing and are only visible under ultraviolet light. Another concept envisions sponge grenades impregnated with infrared dye so that rioters can be later identified [529].
Marker, Laser Paint . A laser dye and scatterer suspended in a host medium. When irradiated with a laser beam, this "laser paint" exhibits laser-like properties, becoming a brilliant light source, without being a collimated beam [355].
Marker, Paint Gun . Gelatin capsule containing a marking agent which splatters on impact leaving a 3" circle and streamers from 12" to 18" [2:294,529].
Marker, Smart Metals . Metals formed with chemical additives or blended in a particular form so that they would function only when used for legitimate purposes or give off telltales signs to inspectors when used improperly [176:84].
Marker, Smoke Dyes . Marking dye added to smoke during crowd control situations [529].
M. Obscurants
Obscurant, Agents . Rapid- hardening agents used to obscure the vision ports/optics of an armored fighting vehicle [144].
Obscurant, Crazing . Higher powered low energy laser Weap ons have the capability of heating and distorting or cracking the glass lenses of optical systems. This effect is called crazing and is caused when the heat buildup and subsequent cooling in the glass surface creates uneven stresses in the glass surface to crack it. The result is a frosted effect, making it impossible to see through the glass lenses or vision blocks (glass windows) in tanks. Such targets may be effected at long ranges, and the optics can be crazed in less time than is needed to blink an eye [1:148].
Obscurant, Laser-Argon Beam . An Argon laser aimed at windows, automobile windshields or airplane canopies for vision denial purposes. Microabrasions in the glass scatter this particular wavelength of light turning the entire sheet a glaring, opaque green. As a result, a sniper could not see through a window or a suicide driver would not be able to look out through the windshield of the truck laden with explosives that he was driving [253].
Obscurant, Myopia . The inability of the human eye to focus light from infinity accurately, which, in practical terms, means beyond approximately 20 feet. If induced through nerve/chemical agents, performance degradation could be dramatic, especially in aviation operations, because studies indicate that as much as 85% of pilot sensory perception/performance is through sight. Nerve gas can induce myopia [14:42].
Obscurant, Smoke-Colored . Colored smoke concentrations produce greater initial psycho- logical and panic effect than white smoke. Caucasians are said to have a greater repugnance to brilliant green smoke, which is associated with disagreeable personal experiences such as sea- sickness, bile and vomit. Negroids and Latins are declared to be most adversely affected by brilliant red. Rioters confronted with a strong concentration of colored smoke feel, instinctively, that they are being marked, or stained, and thus they lose anonymity [2:198-199].
Obscurant, Smoke-White. White obscuring smoke delivered by grenades or smoke pots. Relatively inexpensive, non-toxic, noncontaminating and tactically ideal for police use. Obscuring smokes are temporarily irritating to the nose and throat, and cause those affected to lose visibility, sense of purpose and direction [2:198,529].
N. Opticals
Optical, Add-On com bat Assault Weap on . The use of a low energy laser Weap on as a compliment to the main armament of a tank or infantry fighting vehicle or as a compliment to a antitank missile system [1:172].
Optical, Bucha Effect . High intensity strobe lights which flash at near human brain wave frequency causing vertigo, disorientation, and vomiting [245]. See also Optical, Stroboscopic Device.
Optical, Cameo Bluejay. A 75 pound version of the AN/VLO-7 Stingray designed for use by the Apache attack helicopter [1:161].
Optical, C-CLAW . The Close-com bat Laser Assault Weap on, code named "Roadrunner," was an early 1980s Army tactical laser proto-type which was designed to attack the optics of opposing armored fighting vehicles. The program was canceled in 1984 as a result of adverse publicity over human blinding issues and cost/weight requirements [435].
Optical, Cobra . Prototype of the AN/PLQ-5 Laser Countermeasures System. A 30-pound hand-held laser Weap on used to damage enemy sensors and human eyes. Because this device may operate on three different wave lengths it may be impossible to be currently defended against [1:161-164].
Optical, Cornet Prince . Air Force version of the AN/VLO-7 Stingray. It is a pod mounted system which is intended to protect an aircraft from enemy air defense Weap ons which are dependent on optics and electro-optics for their effect. Cornet Prince has a detection system which notifies an air crew if it is under attack or if attack is imminent so that it can take the proper counter-measures [1:160].
Optical, Crazing . See Obscurant, Crazing.
Optical, Dazer . Battery-operated 20,000 candlepower "flashlight." It uses an alexandrite laser and is meant to provide infantry with a nonle thal capability against armored targets by attacking sensors, night vision devices and personnel. The shoulder-fired Dazer weighs about 20 pounds and is submachine gun size [1:161-163,16].
Optical, Dazzle . A class of optical Weap ons that emit extremely bright light causing temporary blindness.
Optical, Dazzle Rifle . A rifle which emits an eye-safe argon-ion laser beam designed to disorient the target [352].
Optical, Demons. Term for directed-energy munitions [16].
Optical, Electro-Optical Countermeasures System . AN/VLO-7, Stingray. A laser designed to blind the optics and electro-optics of enemy tanks and armored fighting vehicles. Two test versions were deployed in the Gulf War by the Army but not used. This device weighs about 160 kilograms. It can be mounted on both the M1 Abrams tank and the Bradley infantry fighting vehicle [16,546]. See also Antile thal, Sensor-Retroreflectivity. Optical, Flares . Both directional and omnidirectional flares can be used against personnel and materiel to obscure vision.
Optical Flash . A 40-mm artillery shell filled with plastic dye laser rods. Used to blind electro-optic sensors and enemy personnel [114].
Optical, High Intensity Lights . High intensity hydrogen-chloride light on a reflector equipped hand-held candle holder [529].
Optical, Illuminating-Grenade . In night ambushes in Vietnam the MK1 Illuminating Grenade, which produced 55,000 candlepower for 25 seconds, effectively blinded Viet Cong caught in the center of its illumination zone for short periods of time.
Optical, Isotropic Radiators . Special munitions that illuminate or bloom with laser-bright intensity causing the same retinal or optical damage as LEL (low energy laser) Weap ons. Isotropic radiation is generated by an explosive burst that superheats a gaseous plasma surrounding it, causing a laser-bright flash [246].
Optical, Laser . Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation.
Optical, Laser-Argon Beam . See Obscurant, Laser-Argon Beam.
Optical, Laser-Anti-Oil Storage Tank. Man-portable laser system with a back-pack power supply designed for use against storage tanks in the Gulf War. Use debated [16,577].
Optical, Laser Countermeasures System [LCMS] . AN/PLQ-5. M-16 rifle-mounted and backpack- powered 42 pound system. Can detect and disrupt optical and electro-optical targeting systems at "stand-off ranges." While not specifically intended to harm human eyes, the system was canceled so U.S. troops would not be subjected to war crimes concerns [277,520].
Optical, Laser Dazzle System [LDS] . U.K. Royal Navy's low energy laser system deployed during the 1982 Falklands war by two of its frigates [475,476].
Optical, Laser-Infrared CO2. Laser which can heat the skin of a target to cause pain but will not burn the skin. Application against the hand of a suspect holding a knife or gun to a hostage [253]. [USE ON CROWDS VIOLATES CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS.--Ed.]
Optical, Light Flashing Devices. Devices which are much like a photographer's flash bulb but at a greatly increased power. They are used to disorient target individuals by causing temporary flash blindness [23:206].
Optical, Low Energy Laser-Antile thal. See Antile thal, Low Energy Laser.
Optical, Low Energy Laser-Eye Safe. A continuous wave laser, mounted on a M-16/M-203 rifle, that produces a high-intensity glare strong enough to temporarily delay and disorient an adversary so that he can't complete a mental task, like cutting a fence or walking on rough terrain. Effective range of several hundred meters. Laser powered by 6 rechargeable AA size batteries [310:19].
Optical, Mobile Test Unit . Mid- 1970s Army tactical laser concept utilizing a medium powdered laser mounted on a Marine Corps armored personnel carrier called the Mobile Test Unit. Used to shoot down some helicopter drones [435].
Optical Munitions . A class of non-le thal Weap ons which rely upon either a multi-directional or uni- directional intense burst of light [isotropic radiator (laser)] generated by the high-explosive shock heating of an inert gas [543].
Optical, Stroboscopic Device . Devices employed against demonstrators which cause stroboscopic flashing. Same principle as a discotheque "strobe." In the 5-15 hertz range these devices can cause various physical symptoms and in a small portion of the population may trigger epileptic seizures [23:206].
O. Projectiles
Projectile, Bag-Bean . Fabric sacks filled with lead shot (usually No. 9) weighing from 40 to 150 grams, designed to be fired from 12 gauge shotguns and 37mm (40mm) launchers. The bags conform to the shape of the target on impact, producing less damage than a solid hard projectile. The bags are rolled in the cartridge and unroll after exiting the launch barrel. These projectiles are designed for direct impact on the target, therefore accuracy is important to ensure effective impacts. The level of energy delivered ranges from 40 to 100-foot pounds, depending on the distance the projectile has to travel. Also known as Flying Bean Bag or Shot Bag.
Projectile, Bag-Bean-Rubberized, Gun . A prison gun which utilizes rubberized bean bag projectiles. Used for movement of cell blocks and surprise advances [385].
Projectile, Bag-Stun . Early form of nonle thal projectile composed of a 5 1/4 ounce canvas pouch filled with metal buckshot which spread into a 3-inch diameter pancake in flight. Known to cause serious injury [511:672].
Projectile, Bag-Stun, Launcher . An obsolete gun which delivered a cartridge containing a 4" diameter stun-bag loaded with 1/5 to 1/2 lb. of shot. It could be used as handgun or with an extension as a shotgun. It has been replaced by the 12 gauge shotgun and the 37 (and 40) mm launchers [529]. Also known as the stun gun.
Projectile, Ball-Rubber, Grenade . An explosive anti-riot device which hurtles a large number of small "stinging" rubber balls at rioters when ignited. May or may not contain riot control agents [373].Also known as stingball or stinger grenade.
Projectile, Ball-Rubber, Round . The common usage of this term now refers to a number of 5/8 in. rubber balls fired from a 12 ga. shotgun. The 3/8 in. ball is also common. Both have a hardness of about 50 shore. These rounds have maximum effect when fired in confined spaces, where multiple bounces augment the number of impacts on the target with sufficient force to sting rather than hurt. The eyes are the most at risk of damage, due to the small size and velocity of the balls. The older use of this term refers to a rubber ball fitted with a "Blake" attachment to a shotgun. The ball can be solid or filled with liquid or gas. Various designs existed for point or area targets [529].
Projectile, Barricade Penetrating. Any projectile which delivers a riot control agent into a barricade situation via a window or plate-glass. One such projectile is a fin stabilized injection-molded plastic device which disperses a highly- volatile liquid CS agent [2:150,82].
Projectile, Baton-Plastic. A PVC cylinder 1/2 inches in diameter and 4 inches long. Instead of being bounced off of the ground these rounds are directly fired at the intended target. Causes a bruising impact blow with a claimed effective range of 30 to 65 yards. At point blank range this round can be fatal. First used by the British Army in Northern Ireland in February of 1973 as a replacement for rubber bullets [2:159,511:672]. Also known as riot baton round, plastic bullets or PVC bullets.
Projectile, Baton-Rubber. Pliable rubber cylindrical projectiles delivered from the riot gun or British Army signal gun. Aimed at crowd's legs or at the ground for ricochet effect into a crowd [165,529]. Also known as rubber baton or rubber bullet 6- inch.
Projectile, Baton-Wooden. Wooden cylinder delivered by a riot gun or by a British Army signal gun [529]. Also known as broomstick round.
Projectile, Baton-Wooden Multiple . A 37-38mm round which disperses 5 wooden pellets which can be fired from a distance or ricocheted into the mob. Direct fire at close or point blank range can cause serious or fatal injuries [2:158].
Projectile, Baton-Wooden Whistling . A short fluted cylinder made of wood and fired at low-velocity for crowd dispersal. This round makes a whistling sound when fired. Whistling sound and visibility of round valued over kinetic impact. Fired by a Hong Kong Pellet Gun [165].
>B?Projectile, Chaff-Ceramic . Dropped or fired in front of an aircraft which when ingested by a jet engine will destroy its turbine blades and other mechanisms [356:35].
Projectile, Gas Vortex. If a gas vortex, a highly stable phenomenon, was projected at some velocity, the difference in pressure on the leading and trailing edges would produce an impact. Potential use in crowd and rio-control situations [556:19].
Projectile, Launcher-ARWEN . Anti- Riot Weap on Enfield. A hand-held, cylinder fed, shoulder-launched 37mm anti-riot Weap on which is used to launch a variety of impact devices such as bean bags, pellets, rubber and wooden baton rounds, etc.
Projectile, Launcher-Blake Impact Gun. Aluminum alloy-type, golf ball sized projectile fitted to a bolt- action shotgun [529].
Projectile, Launcher-Velocity Adjusting. Small arms Weap on with an adjustable muzzle velocity intended for delivery of less-than-le thal munitions such as rubber or PVC bullets. The purpose of the adjustment is to tailor the velocity to the range [35].
Projectile, Launcher-Very Pistol. A 37mm pistol used to fire tear gas and other nonle thal projectiles.
Projectile, Liquid Filled. Several types of hollow rubber projectiles have been manufactured. The most recent, in a 12 ga. shotgun size, is filled with a liquid dye to mark the target for subsequent identification, in addition to the impact effect. The working range is from 5 to 75 feet. Older types included a 3 inch diameter, .5 lb. rubber ball filled with water, to be used as an impact projectile. The range was 75 ft. The launcher was large and heavy [529].
Projectile, Mine-Claymore. Modular Crowd Control Munition. A nonle thal claymore-type mine which disperses blunt impact ordnance for crowd control purposes [373].
Projectile, Muzzle Launch Ordnance [MLO]. MLO MA/RA 88 less-than-le thal shot for the M16A2 Rifle. Must disorient targets at effective ranges of 30-70 meters, not create shrapnel, and be of minimal hazard [338,373].
Projectile, Ricochet-Soft Plastic. Polyethylene pellets 1/16" in diameter delivered from a standard 12-gauge shotgun aimed to ricochet. Available in larger sizes [529].
Projectile, Ring Airfoil Grenade, Launcher. Launcher Adapter, M234 Designed for attachment to M16A1 rifle. Uses blank cartridge (M755) to propel either Soft Ring Airfoil Grenade (M742) or Sting Ring Airfoil Grenade (M743).
Projectile, Ring Airfoil Grenade-Soft. Soft RAG, M742. A rubberized donut shape with airfoil cross- section that is launched spinning from M234 adapter attached to M16A1 rifle. A series of cavities in the projectile body contain packets of CS powder. Target impact opens the CS packets and disseminates the chemical (powder). This system has been replaced by the Non-le thal 40mm Sponge Grenade.
Projectile, Ring Airfoil Grenade-Sting. Sting RAG, M742. A rubberized donut shape with airfoil cross section that is launched spinning from the M234 adapter attached to M16A1 rifle. Intended as an initial deterrent via kinetic energy impact. Can also be used as a training round. This system has been replaced by the Non-le thal 40mm Sponge Grenade.
Projectile, Rock Salt . Large salt crystals fired from shot guns. Crowd dispersal method.
Projectile, Rubber . These projectiles can be solid (homogeneous) or clad (composite). Solid rubber projectiles can be further classified by density, ranging from high density (hard), to soft (foam). The shape of the homogeneous projectiles varies from a right cylinder (35mm diameter by 3 inches long) to a cylinder with a hemispherical nose, to short cylinders (35mm diameter by 1 1/2 inches long- multi-projectiles, soft foam) to hard, finned shape projectiles (12 gauge), and balls about 5/8 inch. The large cylinders fired to strike the ground in front of the target individuals, bouncing up to hit them. Depending on the distance from the ground impact to the target, the impact point can range from the knees to the head, producing different results. Past experience with this method of firing has shown that.
Projectile, Shards-Ceramic . Fired against aircraft to disable their engines or to degrade their stealth capabilities [16].
Projectile, Splatt-Thixotropic . Special Purpose Low le thality Anti-Terrorist. Any projectile that deforms at impact, without penetrating the body. One materiel preparation designed to accomplish this action is described in the patent. The whole projectile is made of this substance, not just the tip. The older usage of this term referred to any caliber shotgun shell with grease or soft putty on the tip which would deform at impact [529].
Projectile, Sponge Grenade . 40mm nonle thal projectile developed for the M203 grenade launcher made out of spongy material. Can either be used as a kinetic Weap on or with the inclusion of a CS or marking dye wafer. Potentially fatal within 25 meters or if an eye shot occurs. Successor to the discontinued Soft/Sting Airfoil Grenade System.
Projectile, Water Stream . Mobile unit which projects a continuing stream of water for riot control purposes [529].
Projectile, Water Stream-Electrical . See Electrical, Water Stream.
P. Reactants
Reactant, Acetylene, Grenade . One pound bomb containing calcium carbide and water. Upon detonation, forms a bubble of acetylene gas seven feet in diameter. When sucked into the air intake of a diesel at concentrations as little as one percent, the gas would cause the fuel in each cylinder to ignite prematurely, with enough force to break piston rods [144,387].
Reactant, Chemical Compounds . Chemical compounds which are magnitudes more powerful than hydrofluoric acid. A mixture of hydrochloric acid (HCI) and nitric acid (H2NO3) will dissolve most noble metals, such as gold and platinum, and organic compounds. Could be delivered by binary Weap ons to attack structures, armored fighting vehicles, roads, roof tops and optical systems [16,246,356].Also known as supercaustics, superacids, supercorrisive bases, C+, and tire eaters.
Reactant , Cloud Seeding. Silver iodide dropped into clouds over the Ho Chi Minh trail during the Vietnam War in order to promote additional rainfall which would degrade Viet Cong logistics [434]. See also Reactant, Operation Popeye.
Reactant, Combustion Alteration . This technology consists of chemical additives that either contaminate or change the viscosity characteristics of fuel to degrade standard engine performance. The additives may be ingested as a vapor through air intakes, mixed with fuel during the intake cycle or applied directly to a fuel source causing almost instant engine failure [302:13,16].
Reactant, Liquid Metal Embrittlement [LME] . Agents operate by altering the molecular structure of base metals or alloys and could significantly interfere with the operation of the aircraft, vehicles, metal treads and bridge supports to which they were applied. LMEs are clear and have little or no perceptible residue, whether sprayed on or applied with felt-tip markers. Some ambiguity exists because LMEs may refer to both liquids and liquid metals [16,302,356].
Reactant, LME Graffiti . Graffiti used to mask an LME strike against a bridge or other target. Great potential for terrorist use. Example, phone call to law enforcement stating that an LME strike has been conducted against one of a number of bridges in a city using red LME graffiti.
Reactant , Operation Popeye. The cloud-seeding campaign conducted by the U.S. military during the Vietnam War. 2,602 Popeye flights were flown through 1972 in hopes of interdicting the flow of Communists troops and supplies along the Ho Chi Minh Trail [434].
Reactant, Pyrophoric Particles . Particles which when ingested in a combustion chamber give off heat and thus overheat the chamber which causes thermal failure. Caesium would be one likely candidate [144,356]. Also known as polystyrene peanuts.
Q. Riot Control Agents
Riot Control Agent, Area Dispensers . RCA dispensers mounted in the walls and ceilings of prison facilities. They provide law enforcement personnel the ability to move groups out of or from one area to another through CS and OC dispersement [385].
Riot Control Agent, CA . 4- Bromobenzylcyanide. CA was one of the first tear agents used. It is not as effective as CN or CS and is obsolete. CA produces a burning sensation of the mucous membranes and severe irritation and tearing of the eyes with acute pain in the forehead [584:52]. Also known as BBC, larmine, and camite.
Riot Control Agent, Chemical Mace . Small spray can containing a 0.9 per cent solution of agent CN in a variety of petroleum based carriers including a mixed freon/hydrocarbon solvent. First introduced in 1966. CS-Mace then developed in 1968 by suggestion of the U.S. Army [2:213-214,165].
Riot Control Agent, CN . Chloroacetophenone. A lacrimator that causes irritation to the upper respiratory passages and may cause irritations to the skin. On average, it incapacitates for approximately 3 minutes. Discovered by the German chemist Graeber in 1869. Replaced for most purposes by CS [13:19,529].
Riot Control Agent, CR . Dibenz- (b,f)-1,4-oxazepine. Newer riot control irritant developed in England in 1962 by the British chemists Higginbottom and Suchitzsky. About 5 times more effective than CS. In addition, CR is much less toxic than CS. CR is not used in its pure form (a yellow powder) but dissolved in a solution of 80 parts of propylene glycol and 20 parts of water to form a 0.1-percent CR solution. It is used in solution as a riot control agent. Eye pain, discomfort and excessive tearing occur with sometimes painful sensitivity to strong light or temporary blindness. Symptoms can persist for 15 to 30 minutes. Dubbed "fire gas" by the media because of the burning sensation it caused to the skin of rioters when used in Northern Ireland from 1973-1974. Authorized U.S. Army use in 1974 [2:180,67,584:59].
Riot Control Agent, CS . Ortho- chlorobenzalmalononitrile was made the standard riot control agent by the Army in 1959. The term "CS" is derived from the two scientists, B.B. Carson and R.W. Sloughton, who first prepared it in 1928.First used by U.S. civilian law enforcement in 1968 during the riots in Washington D.C. While an effective riot control agent, which incapacitates on average from 5 to 10 minutes, decontamination and cross-contamination is a considerable problem in urban environments [13:19,82,337].
Riot Control Agent, CS1 . Specially formulated to prolong persistency and increase the effectiveness of CS. Unlike CS, CS1 is a free-flowing (micropulverized) agent powder consisting of 95-percent crystalline CS blended with 5-percent silica aerogel. This formulation reduces agglomeration and achieves the desired respiratory effects when dispersed as a solid aerosol [584:59].
Riot Control Agent, CS2 . CS blended with silicone-treated silica aerogel, which causes it to repel water. This treatment improves the physical characteristics of CS by reducing agglomeration and hydrolysis. This form of CS prolongs the effectiveness for both immediate and surface contamination effects. When disturbed, CS2 reaerosolizes to cause respiratory and eye effects. A cloud of waterproofed CS can be kicked up by people walking in the street or grass two months after it has settled [13:50,584:59].
Riot Control Agent, CSX . A form of CS developed for dissemination as a liquid rather than as a powder. One gram of powdered CS is dissolved in 99 grams of trioctylphosphite (TOF). As with CS, CSX stings and irritates the eyes, skin, nose, throat, and lungs of exposed personnel [584:59].
Riot Control Agent, Disperser-Fogger . Conventional insecticide blower adopted for CS and CN dispensing in Vietnam. Produces a fog-type emission for up to a 15 minute period. Conceptual basis was to fill Viet Cong tunnel complexes with large amounts of the CS agent. Another fogger was a handheld gasoline-operated device which dispenses either CS, CN or inert fog at 0.7 gallon/hour [2:178,165]. Also known as mighty mite (M-106) and pepper fogger.
Riot Control Agent, Disperser-Liquid . An Army riot-control agent disperser visually resembling a man- carried flamethrower. Fully loaded weight is approx. 55 pounds. Disperses CS mixed with a trioctylphosphate solvent. [2:178,165]. Also known as liquid stream projector.
Riot Control Agent, Disperser-Powder . Modified Dry-Powder Fire Extinguisher. Powdered CS and CN dispersal [165].
Riot Control Agent, Grenade Electrically Activated. A riot control grenade with a male, electrically activated screw-in socket connection in place of a standard fuse. This enables the grenades to be incorporated into electrical systems, in fixed installations, where they can be activated by a trip device or switch, at will. This is of special importance in security of buildings, and vital installations, providing a dependable, economical protective system that can be locally installed. This system, with variations, is now in use in commercial security systems, as well as in U.S. government and embassy installations [2:133].
Riot Control Agent, Grenade-M73A . Army riot control grenade in use prior to the M47-Type CS Grenade. As of 1992, the M7A3 was still in use because of technical problems with the M47 [67].
Riot Control Agent, Grenade-M47 CS . Basic riot control grenade employed by the Army. Its contents are expelled as a vapor from a taped-over port in the grenade body, causing the grenade to "skitter" around on the ground, making it difficult for rioters to throw back. As of 1992, it has not seen tactical action [67].
Riot Control Agent, Homemade Face Filters . Wet rags and other devices made by prison inmates to counter the effects of riot control agents [385].
Riot Control Agent, Lacrimator . A riot control irritant that will cause blinding tears upon contact with the eyes [444]. Also see Riot Control Agent, CN.
Riot Control Agent, Launcher - Handy Andy. U.S. Army hand-hold type throwaway munition consisting of an aluminum tube with a hand-activated striker in the base. On ignition, the E24 propels a cylindrical rubber projectile containing 50 grams of CS burning formulation to distances of 70-100 yards [2:179].
Riot Control Agent, Launcher-Riot Gun . A Weap on designed specifically to fire tear gas munitions of 37- mm diam. [444:2]. Also known as 1 1/2-in gun, 38-mm gun, gas gun, and tear gas launcher.
Riot Control Agent, Mine . An anti-personnel mine filled with a riot control agent. For perimeter use around detention camps or secured facilities.
Riot Control Agent, OC . Oleoresin Capsicum. A food product obtained from chili peppers which are dried and ground into a fine powder. When mixed with an emulsifier such as mineral, vegetable, soy oil or water, it may be sprayed from a variety of dispensers and used as an irritant for safely controlling violent persons or vicious animals and/or restoration and maintenance of order.
Riot Control Agent, Ring Airfoil Grenade- Soft . See Projectile, Ring Airfoil Grenade- Soft.
Riot Control Agent, Sponge Grenade . See Projectile, Sponge Grenade.
Riot Control Agent, Tear Gas-Invisible. Invisible tear-gas clouds are produced by blast munitions loaded with dust or liquid agents. Invisible tear gas cannot be seen by rioters once it first emerges from a grenade or mechanical dispenser and therefore produces a greater psychological panic-producing effect than tear smoke [2:161-162].
Riot Control Agent, Tear Gas-Visible . Visible tear-gas clouds (tear smoke) emanate from burning grenades and projectiles. Tear smoke is highly visible and plainly indicates the area covered to police and rioter alike [2:161-162].
II. Nonle thal Weap ons Concepts
A. Ethical
Ethical, Biological Weap ons Convention [BWC], 1972 . This convention prohibits the development, production, stockpiling or retention of microbial or biological agents for use as Weap ons. Would likely preclude the use of biodegrading microbes [16,508].
Ethical, Blinding Laser Ban, 1995 . The Department of Defense prohibits the use of lasers specifically designed to cause permanent blindness of unenhanced vision and supports negotiations prohibiting the use of such Weap ons. However, laser systems are absolutely vital to our modern military. Among other things, they are currently used for detection, targeting, range-finding, communications and target destruction...accidental or incidental eye injuries may occur on the battlefield as the result of the use of legitimate laser systems. This prohibition was initiated by the United States in concurrence with other, mostly Western, nations [457].
Ethical, Certain Conventional Weap ons Convention, 1980 . Prohibits or restricts Weap ons which are deemed to be excessively injurious or to have indiscriminate effects. Microwave, radio-frequency radiation, and visible light pulsing at brain-wave frequency may violate this convention [20:49-54,508:45]. Also known as Inhumane Weap ons Convention.
Ethical, Chemical Weap ons Convention [CWC], 1993 . This convention, while not in force, precludes the use of toxic chemicals as a method of warfare. A toxic chemical is one which 'though its chemical action on life processes can cause death, temporary incapacitation or permanent harm to humans or animals.' How supercaustics would be interpreted within this convention is unknown [16,508].
Ethical, Environmental Modification Techniques Ban, 1977. Found in Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD). Bans any technique for changing- through deliberate manipulation of natural processes- the dynamics, composition or structure of the Earth, including its biota, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, or of outer space which will have widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party [20:68-69].
Ethical, Geneva Protocol, 1925 . Whereas the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of analogous liquids, materials or devices, has been justly condemned by the general opinion of the civilized world; and Whereas the prohibition of such use has been declared in Treaties to which the majority of Powers of the world are Parties; and To the end that this prohibition shall be universally accepted as part of International Law, binding alike the conscience and the practice of nations. Extended to bacteriological methods of warfare. The United States has interpreted the Protocol of 1925 as not prohibiting the use of riot control agents [20:57-58].
Ethical, New Martyrdom . A potential form of martyrdom arising from the long-term incapacitation capacity that some nonle thal Weap ons provide. Examples are permanently blinding or disrupting the nervous systems of opposing soldiers. Those living, rather than dead, would represent a new form of martyr. References to the horrors of the gassings of the First World War would undoubtedly be made [149:10-11].
Ethical, Tennessee vs. Garner . A 1985 court case (475 U.S. 1) which held that the use of deadly force to apprehend an apparently unarmed, nonviolent fleeing felon is unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment. Stimulated law enforcement interest in less-than-le thal Weap ons.
B. Functional
Functional, Bouchon . The complete metal fuze assembly of a diversionary device or similar grenade, usually consisting of a safety pin, safety "spoon," and a percussion type ignition device.
Functional, Deflagrate . To burn; consume; to burn rapidly with intense heat and dazzling light.
Functional, Deflagrating Canister . A canister which is designed to burst or burn. When used with a diversionary device, this type of canister is designed to burst or burn at a low enough pressure to prevent the bouchon from being thrown.
Functional, Deflagrating Explosive . Any explosive which deflagrates rather than detonates. Also called a "low" explosive, it is characterized by relatively slow burning processes with progressive reaction rates and buildup of pressure which creates a heaving action.
Functional, Deployment Sequence . The first of three functions when a diversionary device is deployed. It refers to the manner and place in which a diversionary device is deployed. See also Functional, Ignition Sequence and Functional, Firing Sequence.
Functional, Detonate . To explode violently and noisily; also called a "high" explosive it is characterized by very rapid chemical reactions, thus causing tremendously high pressure and brisance (shattering action).
Functional, Detonating Explosive . Any explosive which detonates rather than deflagrates. Also called a "high" explosive, it is characterized by very rapid chemical reactions, thus causing tremendously high pressure and brisance (shattering action).
Functional, Firing Sequence . The second of three functions when a diversionary device is deployed. It refers to the mechanical action of the bouchon, (fuze assembly). See also Functional, Deployment Sequence and Functional, Ignition Sequence.
Functional, Fuse . A narrow tube filled with combustible material, or a wick saturated with such material, for setting off an explosive charge. A pyrotechnic device which serves as the initiator to an explosive charge (e.g. M-3A1, friction type fuse).
Functional, Fuze . Any of various devices for detonating bombs, projectiles, or explosive charges. A mechanical device used as the initiator to an explosive charge (e.g. M- 201A1, percussion type fuze).
Functional, Hybrids . Weap ons that can be switched from "le thal" to "nonle thal" by a simple mechanism, having multiple barrels, or using ammunition which can be switched at launch (single barrel, lightened logistic chain) [529].
Functional, Ignition . Setting a thing on fire, to cause something to burn.
Functional, Ignition Sequence . The third of three functions when a diversionary device is deployed. It refers to the events which take place during the burning of the charge. See also Functional, Deployment Sequence and Functional, Firing Sequence.
C. Operational
Operational, Brevity Code . A one or two word phrase which, when transmitted on a radio, carries a much larger meaning. Used to keep transmission time to a minimum without unduly tying up valuable "air time." Usually repeated twice to ensure understanding.
Operational, Denial System . Components of a security system that prevent an intruder or adversary from completing an intrusive hostile act on a fixed sight [359].
Operational, Dirty Battlefield . A battlefield operational environment in which civilians and other noncom batants are mixed in with com batants [56].
Operational, Environmental Warfare . A form of attack based on purposeful environmental degradation by a state or non-state group against an opponent. An early example would be the salting of the fields of Carthage by the Romans. The most recent example would be the blowing up of 732 oil wells in Kuwait and the releasing of oil into the Persian Gulf by Iraq in 1991--[not to mention Agent Orange and the use of depleted uranium armaments--Ed.].
Operational, Immediate Action Drill . Any action, technique or procedure which is initiated by an event rather than a signal [5].
Operational, le thal-Nonle thal Coordination . A process by which hardkill and softkill Weap ons are made to enhance the effects of one another rather than degrade each others' performance. Applied to the defensive systems of a warship [570].
Operational, Long Term Disablement. The outcome of the application of nonle thal force that affects the opponent beyond duration of the confrontation or conflict. Blinding, maiming or psychologically deranging the opponent represent forms of long term disablement. This form of disablement burdens a society and is anathema to the Western definition of nonle thality.
Operational, Mobile Security System . Area/fixed site denial or delay systems that are portable, leveraging on nonle thal technology and minimal installation costs [402].
Operational, Mobile Tactics . A procedure used against rioters in which an anti-riot team is embarked on vehicles, rapidly driven near rioters, whereupon they quickly disembark and rush toward the crowd, followed by another team which repeats the procedure and exploits the momentum gained by the original team.
Operational, Nonle thal-le thal Effect . A nonle thal attack which purposefully sets up an opposing soldier or vehicle for a fatal attack. Example, a soldier struck to the ground by a stick'em' and then shot by a conventional round or killed by an artillery barrage.
Operational, Nonle thal Weap ons, Non-Western.. Weap ons which are designed to cause long-term disablement to military personnel and civilians. These Weap ons may be employed by either non-state forces or non- Western nation-states. Forms of nonle thal non- Western Weap ons include blinding lasers, disease organisms, and genetic alteration [149:3].
Operational, Nonle thal Weap ons, Western . Weap ons that are explicitly designed and primarily employed so as to incapacitate personnel or materiel, while minimizing fatalities, permanent injury to personnel, and undesired damage to property and the environment. Unlike conventional le thal Weap ons that destroy their targets principally through blast, penetration and fragmentation, non-le thal Weap ons employ means other than gross physical destruction to prevent the target from functioning. Non-le thal Weap ons are intended to have one, or both, of the following charac- teristics: a. they have relatively reversible effects on personnel or materiel, b. they affect objects differently within their area of influence [229:1-2].
Operational, Passive Deterrents . A genre of nonle thal Weap ons that does not affect the physiology of the target individual. Includes dyes, personal alarms, and scent sprays.
Operational, Rules of Engagement [ROEs]. Generally, rules that provide implementation guidance on actions to exercise 1. the inherent right and obligation of self-defense and 2. the application of force for mission accomplish- ment by national/multinational military forces in international not domestic situations. The many boundaries to ROE's include international laws and treaties, national policy and custom. Standing Rules of Engagement refer to those generally intended for all situations, but tailored ROE's for specific situations may augment those standing rules. This is a general, not legal, description.
Operational, Second Order Effect . A nonle thal attack ultimately resulting in an unintentional death. For example, a pilot, blinded by a laser unable to safely land his or her aircraft or a patient dies because the power to an incubator or iron lung in a hospital is cut off due to the destruction of a power plant.
Operational, Short Term Disablement . A form of disablement which has relatively reversible effects on personnel or materiel [230:1].
Operational, Tailored Weap onry . Alternative, and likely more accurate, term for nonle thal Weap onry. Such Weap onry is qualitatively advanced over traditional firearms and munitions because it allows for precision control over the application of politico- military force. Rather than killing (100% force) or not-killing (0% force) an opponent these Weap ons offer new capabilities in the 1-99% range between no action and le thal force.
D. Physiological
Physiological, Acetylcholine Effect. The temporary effect an organism experiences after long periods of high stress, characterized by a total emotional surrender. Derived from an overabundance of the compound acetylcholine which is active in the transmission of nerve impulses.
Physiological, Diversion . A diversion which acts directly on a person by affecting one or more of the five senses. Physiological, Impulse Noise . Noise which lasts less than one second.
Physiological, Lag Time. The physiological time lag which occurs between the time a stimulus is perceived until the body responds. In a healthy, well-rested human, this takes about three-quarters of a second.
Physiological, Rhodopsin. A purplish protein pigment, contained in the rods of the retina, that is transformed by the action of light and is necessary for vision in dim light.
Physiological, Sensory Overload. A temporary inability of an organism to correctly interpret and appropriately respond to life's stimuli because of the volume of input.
Physiological, Ulster Techniques. Psychophysiological techniques employed by the British in Northern Ireland based on sensory deprivation which can lead to long- lasting post-traumatic neurosis. Methods used included hooding, masking noise, wall standing, inadequate diet, sleep deprivation and some physical brutality [HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS .--Ed.] [532].
E. Theoretical
Theoretical, Environmental Security . The recognition that the natural environment in which humans exist must be protected for their continued benefit. Because of the magnitude of many environmental problems, they require regional not national level solutions.
Theoretical, Fourth Epoch War. Strategic level theory of war utilizing an energy paradigm of Western civilization. The magnitude of change forecast is equivalent in scale to the Dark Ages, 378-732, and the European Renaissance, 1346-1648. During these transformations a new energy source is demonstrated on the battlefield, the dominant polity form "fails," the non-state soldier achieves dominance on the battlefield, crime and war blur, a new economy emerges, social classes shift, and advanced forms of battlespace and Weap onry develop [633:23-25].
Theoretical, Fourth Generation Warfare. Operational level theory of warfare which views military change based upon advances in either technology or ideas. The emerging "idea based" fourth generation is thought to be based on terrorism and low intensity conflict [633:19-21].
Theoretical, MTR. A military technical revolution was declared by the Soviets to be taking place back in the 1980s. This revolution is based on emerging technologies, electronic and information systems and non-nuclear deep strike munitions, and will qualitatively alter the conduct of future war. The MTR is the conceptual forerunner to the revolution in military affairs (RMA) [640:2]. See also Theoretical, RMA .
Theoretical, New Gunpowder Revolution. The perception that the wide scale application of nonle thal technology on the battlefield will be as significant as the fielding of gunpowder based firearms during the European Renaissance [149:9].
Theoretical, Nonle thality . The theory that overwhelming nonle thal force could be used to defeat le thal force [418:24].
Theoretical, Post-Engine, Mechanical, Energy . For more advanced forms of nonle thal Weap onry such as lasers and acoustics to properly function post-engine (mechanical) forms of energy will be required [149:7]. See also Theoretical, Fourth Epoch War.
Theoretical, RMA. Revolution in Military Affairs. Operational level theory which views military technical, doctrinal, and force structure changes now taking place equivalent in magnitude to the 1920's and 1930's when armored warfare, strategic bombing, and amphibious and carrier operations developed. The RMA is generally accepted by the U.S. Armed Forces and Office of Net Assessment [640].
Theoretical, RPMA. Fourth Epoch War theory perception that a revolution in political and military affairs (RPMA) is taking place. Far larger than a revolution in military affairs (RMA), this historical transition will result in the eventual demise of the nation-state, the blurring of crime and war, and the rise of new competing polity forms [633]. See also Theoretical, Fourth Epoch War.
Theoretical, Sixth Generation Warfare. Soviet (Russian) view of future warfare based upon faulty historical modeling which does not differentiate between strategic and operational level change. The current military revolution is said to be equivalent in magnitude to the 1920s & 1930s or the 1950s & 1960s. Attributes of the new form of warfare developing will include the ascendancy of aerospace operations, the growing importance of electronic warfare and the computerization of armed com bat [634]. See also Theoretical, MTR.
Theoretical, Third Wave War. Theory of future war modeled on "waves" of economic based civilizations. First wave civilizations are agricultural, second wave civilizations are industrial and emerging third wave civilizations are informational. Future warfare will be informational based with the Gulf War representing the first of these conflicts. Magnitude of current change now taking place viewed as equivalent to that of the Industrial Revolution [633:21-23].
Theoretical, Twenty-First Century Politico-Military Force Matrix . Nonle thal technology, when coupled with traditional forms of le thal Weap onry, allow for the application of short-term incapacitation, long-term incapacitation, and deadly force against the physical and mental/perceptual attributes of human targets and the hardware and software attributes of machine targets. This advanced form of politico-military force application can be expressed in a matrix [149:4].
Theoretical, War, Clausewitzian. A struggle between nation-states or their coalitions over the preservation and extension of national sovereignty.
Theoretical, War, Post-Clausewitzian . A struggle between competing forms of social and political organization over which the eventual successor to the nation-state will be built [633:27].
Theoretical, Weap ons of Mass Protection. Nonle thal, antile thal, and information warfare Weap ons [418:16].
I. Books
[1] Anderberg, MajGen. Bengt & Wolbarsht, Dr. Myron L. (1992). Laser Weap ons: The Dawn of a New Military Age . New York, New York: Plenum Press.
[2] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1981). Riot Control: Materiel and Techniques. 2nd Edition. Boulder, Colorado: Paladin Press. (1st Edition. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: Stackpole Books, 1969).
[3] Clede, Bill. (1987). Police Nonle thal Force Manual: Your Choices This Side of Deadly Force. Harrisburg, Penn- sylvania: Stackpole Books.
[4] Doswald-Beck, Louise., ed. (1993). Blinding Weap ons: Reports of the Meetings of Experts Convened by the International Committee of the Red Cross on Battlefield Laser Weap ons 1989-1991. Geneva, Switzerland: International Committee of the Red Cross.
[5] Heal, Charles "Sid." (1991). The Diversionary Device Reference Manual. Doylestown, Pennsylvania: National Tactical Officer's Association.
[6] Manual of Tear Gas Information.(1967). Alternative title, Training Officer's Tear Gas Blue Book, . Saltsburg, Pennsylvania: Federal Laboratories.
[7] McLaughlin, Vance. (1992). Police and the Use of Force: The Savannah Study. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.
[8] Momboisse, Ramond M. (1970). Riots, Revolutions and Insurrections. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
[9] Momboisse, Ramond M. (1969). Confrontations, Riots, Urban Warfare. MSM Enterprises.
[10] Jones, Eugene S. (1970). Law Enforcement Chemical Agents and Related Equipment. Santa Cruz, California: Davis Publishing, Co.
[11] Swearengen, Thomas F. (1966). Tear Gas Munitions: An Analysis of Commercial Riot Gas Guns, Tear Gas Projectors, Grenades, Small Arms Ammunition, and Related Tear Gas Devices. Springfield, Illinois: C.C. Thomas.
[12] United States Marine Corps. (1940). Small Wars. 1st Printing. Manhattan, Kansas: Sunflower Press. (2nd Printing, 1996).
[13] Verwey, Wil D. (1977). Riot Control Agents and Herbicides in War: Their Humanitarian, Toxicological, Ecological, Military, Polemological, and Legal Aspects. Leyden: A.W. Sijthoff.
II. Chapters
[14] Cook, Dr. David L. (1992). Refractive Error. Vision, What Every Pilot Needs to Know. Atlanta, Georgia: Invision Press, 42.
[15] Foreman, Dave & Haywood, Bill., eds. (1987). Roads and Tires, Vehicles and Heavy Equipment. EcoDefense: A Field Guide to Monkeywrenching. Tucson, Arizona: Ned Ludd Books, 89-156.
[16] Kokoski, Richard. (1994). Non-le thal Weap ons: a case study of new technology developments. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). SIPRI Yearbook 1994. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 367-386.
[17] O'Connor, Paul G. (1994, Aug.). Waging Wars with Nonle thal Weap ons. Magyar, Dr. Karl P., ed. Challenge and Response: Anticipating US Military Security Concerns. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air University Press., 333-344.
[18] Powell, William. (1971). Natural, Nonle thal, and le thal Weap ons. The Anarchist Cookbook. Secaucus, New Jersey: Barricade Books, Inc., 77-110.
[19] Reaves, Brian A. & Smith, Pheny Z. (1993). Table 15a. Types of nonle thal Weap ons authorized for use by officers in local law enforcement agencies, 1993. Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics, 1993: Data for Individual State and Local Agencies with 100 or More Officers. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Department of Justice, 169-180.
[20] Reisman, W. Michael & Antoniou, Chris T., eds. (1994). Using Force (selected protocols and conventions). The Laws of War: A Comprehensive Collection of Primary Documents on International Laws Governing Armed Conflict. New York, New York: Random House.
[21] Sapolsky, Harvey M. (1994). War without Killing. Sarkesian, S. & Flanagin, J., eds. U.S. Domestic and National Security Agendas. Contributions in Military Studies, Vol. 152. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press., 27-40.
[22] Summers, Harry G. (1985). Operation Ranch Hand. Vietnam War Almanac. New York, New York; Facts on File Publications, 66-67.
[23] Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (1978). Non-penetrating kinetic energy projectiles & Electric, acoustic and electromagnetic-wave Weap ons. Anti-personnel Weap ons. London, England: Taylor & Francis Ltd., 108-110, 202-210.
[24] Toffler, Alvin & Heidi. (1993). War Without Blood? War and Anti-War: Survival at the Dawn of the 21st Century. Boston, Massachusetts: Little, Brown and Company, 125-136.
III. Documents
[25] AAI Corp. (1979). Incapacitating Agent Weap ons Technology. Baltimore, Maryland.
[26] Adams, J.P. (1966, Apr.). Teargas injuries; a clinical study of hand injuries and an experimental study on its effects on peripheral nerves and skeletal muscles in rabbits. The Journal of Bone Surgery, 48.
[27] Adams Schmidt, Dana. (1971, 11 Jan.). Pentagon says defoliation may help South Vietnamese economy. The New York Times.
[28] Aerospace Daily. (1995, 28 Jul.). Lack of DOD requirements prevents non-le thal technology growth, 141.
[29] Aerospace Daily. (1995, 28 Jul.). SASC provides $37.2 million for new non-le thal Weap ons office, 141.
[30] Aerospace Daily. (1993, 12 Aug.). Regarding Non-le thal Weap ons, 245.
[31] Aerospace Daily. (1992, 6 Mar.). Pentagon Eyes Minimum-le thality Weap ons, 377.
[32] Aftergood, Steven. (1994, Sep.-Oct.). The Soft-Kill Fallacy: The Idea of Non-le thal Weap ons is Politically Attractive and Purposefully Misleading. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 50, (5) 40-45.
[33] Agence France-Presse. (1995, 24 Feb.). Goo, suds and bean bags: new additions to US arsenal in Somalia, Internet.
[34] Air Force Times. (1995, 17 Jul.). Waves of Goo, 55, (50) 32.
[35] Air Force Times (1994, 11 Apr.). Crimebusters!
[36] Alexander, John B. (1996, Jun.). Shoot, But Not to Kill. International Defense Review, 29, (6) 77-78.
[37] Alexander, Dr. John B. (1996, Mar.). Non-le thal Weap ons Demand Expands as Missions Change. National Defense, 80, (516) 34-35.
[38] Alexander, John B. (1995, 9 Mar.). Non-le thal Weap ons and the Future of War. LA-UR 95-699. Invited presentation to the Harvard-MIT Seminar on the Future of War. John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies, Harvard University Center for International Affairs.
[39] Alexander, John B. (1994, 2 Nov.). Nonle thal Weap ons: Concepts, Applications, & Issues. LA-UR 94-3580. Presented to the Bourn's College of Engineering, University of California, Riverside.
[40] Alexander, John B. (1994, 27 Sep.). Nonle thal Antimateriel Application of Superacids and Other Very Aggressive Chemical Agents. LA-CP 94-203. Presented to NATO Advisory Group on Aerospace Research and Development, Rome, Italy.
[41] Alexander, John B. (1994, 23 Aug.). A Proposal for Non-le thal Force Development. LA-CP 94-190. Presented to Defense Science Board, University of California, Irvine.
[42] Alexander, John B. (1994, Jul.). Deeskalation und der Bedarf von Schonenden Waffen (Deescalation and the Need for Nonle thal Weap ons) with Dipl Ing Ulrich Rieger. LA-UR 94-2205. Published in German by Deutsche Aerospace.
[43] Alexander, John B. (1994, May.). Nonle thal Weap ons: A Need for New Options. LA-UR 94-1497. Presented at the International Symposium for Common Defense 1994 "Keeping the Peace," Arlington, Virginia.
[44] Alexander, John B. (1994, 28 Mar.). Nonle thal Weap ons as Force Options for the Army. LA-UR 94-861. Presented to the National Research Council, Board on Army Science and Technology, National Academy of Science.
[45] Alexander, John B. (1994, 24 Jan.). Nonle thal Defense Briefing. LA-UR 94-72. Presented to NATO AGARD, Paris, France.
[46] Alexander, John B. (1993, 27 Oct.). Nonle thal Weap ons and Limited Force Options. LA-UR 93-3747. Presented to the Council on Foreign Relations, New York, New York.
[47] Alexander, John B. (1993, 2 Jun.). Nonle thal Weap ons Technology. Proceedings of the MIT Conference on the Political Implications of Non-le thal Warfare Technologies. Lexington, Massachusetts.
[48] Alexander, John B. (1993, 7 Mar.). New Weap ons for a New World Order: The Pentagon looks to nonle thal technology. The Boston Globe, 70.
[49] Alexander, John B. (1992, 13 Nov.). Rethinking National Security Requirements & the Need for Nonle thal Weap ons Options. LA-UR 92-3773. Submitted to President-Elect Clinton's Transition Team.
[50] Alexander, John B. (1992, 29 Sep.). Potential Non-le thal Policy Issues. LA-UR 92-3206. Submitted to the Wall Street Journal.
[51] Alexander, John B. et al. (1992, May). Antimateriel Technology. LA-12319-PR Laboratory-Directed Research and Development.
[52] Alexander, John B. & Gates, Robert. (1991, Sep.). Contingency Mission Technology. LA-UR 91-3161.
[53] Alexander, John B. (1990, Sep.). Future Applications of Directed Energy Weap ons in Non-le thal Defense. LA-CP 90-393.
[54] Alexander, US Army Ret. Col. John B. (1989, Oct.). Antimateriel Technology. Military Review, 69, (10) 29-41.
[55] Alexander, Lexi & Klare, Julia L. (1995-1996, Win.). Nonle thal Weap ons: New Tools for Peace. Issues in Science and Technology, 12, (2) 67-74.
[56] American Defense Preparedness Association. (1996, 6- 7 Mar.). Non-le thal Defense II Conference: Proceedings & Updated Attendee Roster. Alexander, John B., chair. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Tysons Corner, McLean, Virginia.
[57] Americans for Effective Law Enforcement. (1988). Use-of Force Tactics and Non-le thal Weap onry. Alert Issue, (3) 2- 6.
[58] Amnesty International, National Office. (1988). Israel and the Occupied Territories: the misuse of tear gas by Israeli army personnel in the Israeli Occupied Territories. New York, New York.
[59] Amouyal, Barbara. (1990, 19 Nov.). Use of Nonle thal Weap ons May Alter Military Strategy. Defense News, 5, 7.
[60] Amouyal, Barbara & Munro, Neil. (1990, 5 Nov.). Labs Rush Nonle thal Arms for Mideast Deployment. Defense News, 10, 1.
[61] Anderberg, Bengt, Bring, Ove E. & Wolbarsht, Myron L. (1992, Aug.). Blinding Laser Weap ons and International Humanitarian Law. Journal of Peace Research, 29, (3) 287- 297.
[62] Anderberg, Bengt & Wolbarsht, Myron L. (1992, May). Hand-Held Laser Weap ons are Waiting in the Wings. Armed Forces Journal International, 129, (10) 60.
[63] Anderson, Col. Gary W. (1996, Jul.). There's A Better Way: Tomorrow's Missions Cry Out For A Mix of le thal and Non-le thal Weap ons. Armed Forces Journal International, 133, (12) 15.
[64] Anderson, S.E. (1971, Jan.). CS and its use. The Military Review.
[65] Anderson, Jon R. (1995, 8 May.). Fighting with new purpose: Marines' new 'experimental' unit looks at future wars. Navy Times, 30. Marine Corps Edition.
[66] Andrews, Andy E. & Alexander, John B. (1993, Oct.). Softer Response Required as Global Thre ats Change. National Defense, 78, (491) 23-24.
[67] Applegate, Rex. (1992, Dec.). Riot Control: Army and National Guard Unprepared to Rule the Mob. Soldier of Fortune, 43- 47, 71.
[68] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1978, Feb.). New U.S. Army Riot Control Developments. Law & Order, 56-57, 62.
[69] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1974, Jul.). Guns & the Law: Multipurpose Police Handgun Developments, Non-le thal Police Weap onry May be the Most Significant Development in the History of Law Enforcement. Guns, 28.
[70] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1973, Jun.). Guns & the Law: New Ideas for Law Enforcement Part 2. Guns, 24.
[71] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1972, Sep.). Guns & the Law: Non-le thal Weap ons and the Law. Guns, 30.
[72] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1971, Dec.). Guns & the Law: Non-le thal Weap ons, Part IV. Guns, 34.
[73] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1971, Aug.). Guns & the Law: Non-le thal Weap ons, Part III. Guns, 26.
[74] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1971, Jul.-Aug.). Nonle thal Police Weap ons. Ordnance, 56, (307) 62-66.
[75] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1971, Jul.). Guns & the Law: Non-le thal Weap ons, Part II. Guns, 28.
[76] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1971, Jun.). Guns & the Law: Non-le thal Weap onry. Guns, 32.
[77] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1970, Sep.). Guns & the Law: Pepper Fogger. Guns, 30.
[78] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1970, Aug.). The Ferret Barricade Round, A 12 Gauge Riot Shotgun Projectile that Requires No Attachment. Law & Order, 112.
[79] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1970, Apr.). Guns & the Law: Tear Gas Grenades. Guns, 26.
[80] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1970, Feb.). Guns & the Law: Ferret Barricade Round. Guns, 28.
[81] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1969, Nov.). New Weap onry for Riot Control. The National Guardsman, 10.
[82] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1969, Sep.-Oct.). Riot Control 1969. Ordnance, 54, 180-184.
[83] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1968, Oct.). Mace Revisited. Law & Order, 50.
[84] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1968, May.). Super Sonic Sound- A New Police Weap on. Law & Order, 28.
[85] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1967, Aug.). Guns & the Law: The Long Riot Baton. Guns, 28.
[86] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1967, Jun.). Guns & the Law: New Weap on Against Crime. Guns, 28.
[87] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1967, May.-Jun.). Weap ons for Riot Control. Ordnance, 51, 604.
[88] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1966, Jun.). The Chemical Mace, Evaluation of a New Police Weap on for Mob Control or Individual Defense. Law & Order.
[89] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1966, May.-Jun.). The Chemical Mace. The National Sheriff, 8.
[90] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1965, Sep.-Oct.). "Soft Soaping" The Rioters. The National Sheriff, 4.
[91] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1965, Sep.). Bubbles & Banana Peels, A New "Soft" Weap on for Destroying Dignity. Law & Order, 22.
[92] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1965, Mar.). The New Multi- Purpose Riot Control Grenade. Law & Order, 53.
[93] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1964, Jul.-Aug.). New Riot Control Weap ons. Ordnance, 67.
[94] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1964, Jul.). A Commentary on Riot Control Chemical Tear Gas....CN and CS. Law & Order, 41.
[95] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1964, Mar.) The Long Riot Baton. Law & Order, 36 .
[96] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1963, Oct.). Smoke vs. the Mob Cancer. The Police Chief.
[97] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1963, Oct.). A New Police Shock-Baton. Law & Order, 16.
[98] Applegate, Col. Rex. (1963, Mar.). The Organization and Tactics of Professional Riot Control Forces. Army, 53.
[99] Arbetter, Lisa. (1994, Jun.). A Pepper Pinch. Security Management, 38, 14-15.
[100] Arbrogast, Walter W. (1976, Jan.). Soft/Sting Ring Airfoil Grenade Civil Disturbance Control System. Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland: Weap ons Systems Concept Office.
[101] Arkin, William. (1995, Dec.). Vienna Meeting Sets Ban on Blinding Laser Weap ons. Laser Focus World, 31, (12), 62.
[102] Arkin, William. (1995, 17 Jul.). Ban Tactical Laser Weap ons: DoD Maintains Blinding is Not Violation of War. Defense News, 20.
[103] Arkin, William. (1995, 10 May.). The Pentagon's Blind Ambition (Blinding Laser Weap ons). Opinion-Editorial. New York Times (Late New York Edition), A23.
[104] Army Times. (1994, 10 Oct.). Perry seeks directive on nonle thal warfare feat, 34.
[105] Arquilla, John & Ronfeldt, David. (1992). Cyberwar is Coming! RAND Pamphlet P-7791. Santa Monica, California: The RAND Corporation.
[106] Ary, USMC. Maj. Vaughn A. (1996, Aug.). New Rules of Engagement for Today's Missions. Unpublished paper.
[107] Atkinson, Rick.(1995, 26 Feb.). Bullets to beanbags: A military evolution. The Kansas City Star, A- 1.
[108] Atkinson, Rick. (1995, 25 Feb.). Marines test new arsenal for Somalia. Washington Post, Internet.
[109] Atwal, Kay & Tapscott, Mark. (1993, Apr.). Non- le thal Laser Rifle Testing at Fort Bragg, Naval Anti-Missile Laser is Readied for Sea. Defense Electronics, 25, 18-19.
[110] Audsley, David (1989, Fal.) Flash/Sound Diversionary Device Evaluation. The Tactical Edge, 6.
[111] Aviation Week & Space Technology. (1995). Panel's Report Backs Nonle thal Weap ons-High-Priiority Emerging Missions May Bring Development Push, 143, (16) 50.
[112] Aviation Week & Space Technology. (1994, 24 Jan.) Government/Military: John B. Alexander, program manager for Nonle thal Defense, Los Alamos (NM) National Laboratory (Aerospace Laureate), 140, (4) 19-20.
[113] Aviation Week & Space Technology. (1993, 24 May.). Army Prepares for Non-le thal com bat (Low Collateral Damage Munitions program). 138, (21) 62.
[114] Aviation Week & Space Technology. (1992, 7 Dec.). Nonle thal Weap ons Give Peacekeepers Flexibility. 137, (23) 50-51.
[115] Bacon, LtCol. Douglas C. (1980, Oct.). Battlefield Lasers: A New Problem With an Old Cure. Military Review, 60 (10) 33-39.
[116] Baker, David. (1994, Oct.). Wizard Wars & Air Power in the 21st Century-- Part 2. Air International, 47, 214-217.
[117] Balzar, John. (1995, 25 Feb.). Marines take a Tip from L.A. Riots Somalia: Southland crowd control failures lead to non- le thal devices that may cut casualties as troops shield U.N. pullout. Los Angeles Times, Internet.
[118] Bandman, A.L. & Savateyev, Med Col. N.V. (1977). Toxicology of CR. Voyenno-Meditsinskiy Zhurnal, 3, 84-86. UDC 615.9:623. 459.43., 126-130.
[119] Barrie, Darwin N. (1988, Jun.). Maricopa County's evaluation of less-than-le thal electronic devices. The Police Chief, 55, (6) 17.
[120] Barry, Col. John L., Everett, LtCol. Michael W. & Peck, LtCol. Allen G.(1994). Nonle thal Military Means: New Leverage for a New Era. Policy Analysis Paper 94-01, National Security Program. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
[121] Barry, J. & Morganthau, T. (1994, 7 Feb.). Soon, 'Phasers on Stun.' Newsweek, 123, (6) 24-26.
[122] Baugham, T. Frank. (1942). The ABC of Practical Riot Gun Instruction. Washington, District of Columbia: National Rifle Association.
[123] Beal, Cliff. (1995, Dec.). Bang! Bang! You're Not Dead. Focus, 63.
[124] Becker, Jon B. (1996, Spr.). The Legal Aspects of Diversionary Devices. The Tactical Edge, 53.
[125] Becker, Jon B. & Heal, Charles. (1996, Feb.) Less-Than-le thal Force: Doctrine must lead the technology rush. International Defense Review, 29, (2) 62-64.
[126] Beecher, W. (1966, Feb.). Chemical versus Viet Cong: right or wrong? The National Guardsman, 20.
[127] Begert, USMC. LtCol. Matthew. (1996, 5 Jun.). Non-le thal Applications: A USMC View. Slide Series. U.S. Army Test and Evaluation Command, "Visions of Future Conflict- Test Technology Drivers," Symposium, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, Maryland.
[128] Begley, Sharon. (1994, 7 Feb.). One Pill Makes You Larger, One Pill Makes You Small... Newsweek, 123, (6) 37.
[129] Bender, Frank. (1974, Nov.-Dec.). Ring Airfoil Grenades. National Defense.
[130] Bernstein, Theodore. (1985, 22 Jan.). Evaluation of the Electric Shock Hazard for the Nova XR 5000 Stun Gun. Unpublished. Madison Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin.
[131] Betts, R. & Denton, F. (1967, Oct.). An evaluation of chemical crop destruction in Vietnam. RAND Corporation Memo. RM-5446 ISA/ARPA. Santa Monica, California.
[132] Biggs, M. (1990). Non-le thal Weap ons: A tool for law enforcement, 6 (1) 37-43.
[133] Blumenfeld, Stewart N. (1968). Employment of the Riot Control Agent CS in Vietnam. Office of the Science Advisor, Military Assistance Command, Vietnam.
[134] Blumenthal, R. (1970, 15 Mar.). US shows signs of concern over effect in Vietnam of 9-year defoliation program. The New York Times.
[135] Blundy, David & Pringle, Peter. (1974, 27 Oct.). New Ulster riot control gas worries experts. London Times.
[136] Bodenheimer, T.S. & Rose, L. (1968, Aug.). Mace. Survival, 10.
[137] Boffey, P. M. (1971, Jan.). Herbicides in Vietnam, AAAS study finds widespread devastation. Science, 171.
[138] Bowers, M.B. et al. (1960, Jun.). Interim report of CS exposures in plant workers. U.S. Chemical Warfare Laboratories Technical Memo. CWL-TM-24-50.
[139] Brady, LtCol. Robert. (1995, July.). Tofflers missed importance of nonle thal Weap ons. Letters to the Editor. Special Warfare, 8, (3) 45.
[140] Bramwell, E.C.B. (1961, Feb.). Skin reaction and sensitivity to CS. Porton Tech Paper 757.
[141] Breit, J.M. (1965, Mar.). Nonle thal Incapacitating-Weap on: Liquid Stream Projector Feasibility Study. Technical Paper No. RAC-TP-168 submitted to Advanced Projects Agency, Washington, D.C. under contract No. SD-212). McLean, Virginia: Research Analysis Corporation.
[142] Brennan, Dennis T. (1976, Apr.). Riot Control Without Bloodshed: The Soft/Sting Ring Airfoil Grenade. A Feasibility Review of the U.S. Army's Experimental Civil Disturbance Control System. Cleveland, Ohio: City of Cleveland, Office of the Mayor.
[143] Bruel, P.V. & Olesen, H.P. (1973). Infrasonic Measurements. B.K. Technical Review, 3, 14-25.
[144] Budiansky, Stephen. (1987, 20 Jul.). All stuck up, no way to go. U.S. News & World Report, 62.
[145] Bunker, Robert J. (1996, Aut.). Advanced Battlespace and Cybermaneuver Concepts: Implications for Force XXI. Parameters, 26 (3) 108-120.
[146] Bunker, Robert J. (1996, May.-Jun.). Nonle thal Defense II Conference. Military Review, 76, (3) 90.
[147] Bunker, Dr. Robert J. (1996, Feb.). Fourth Epoch War: Strategic Considerations and Responses. Prepared for Command's Warfighting Lab, Marine Corps com bat Development Command (MCCDC). NSSP Report 96-1. San Bernardino, California: National Security Studies Program, California State University, San Bernardino.
[148] Bunker, Robert J. (1995, 28 Aug.). U.S. Must Seize the Future With Tactical Laser Development. Defense News, 15, 19.
[149] Bunker, Robert J. & Moore, T. Lindsay. (1996, Feb). Nonle thal Technology and Fourth Epoch War: A New Paradigm of Politico-Military Force. Land Warfare Paper No. 23. Arlington, Virginia: Institute of Land Warfare, Association United States Army.
[150] Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice. (1949, Nov.). Use of Tear Gas and Smoke.
[151] Burnett, Richard. (1993, 24 Oct.). Contractors Hatch New Weap ons. The Orlando Sentinel.
[152] Burnett, W.A. et al. (1961, May). The influence of particle size on the subjective effects of CS. Porton Tech. Paper 776.
[153] Business Week. (1972, 29 Jul.). The hunt for nonle thal guns, (2239) 34-36.
[154] California Legislature & Assembly, Committee on Criminal Justice. (1977). Less-Than le thal Weap ons: Hearing, Los Angeles, California Oct 22, 1976. Sacramento, California: Assembly Publications Office.
[155] Campbell, C. (1992, 27 Sep.). The le thal bomb that does not kill. Sunday Telegraph, 6.
[156] Campbell, Donald & Egner, Donald O. (1976, Jan.). Modeling for Less-le thal Chemical Devices. Technical Memorandum 2-76. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory.
[157] Cantrow, Ellen. (1988, Oct.). Not Tears Alone (Israeli use of tear gas in West Bank and Gaza). Technology Review, 91, 16-17.
[158] Capaccio, Tony. (1995, 23 Jan.). U.S. Commanders State Uses for Non-le thal Technology. Defense Week, 16, 3.
[159] Casey, Joe D. (1988, Feb.). Research and Development Needed for Less-Than-le thal Weap ons. The Police Chief, 55, (2) 7.
[160] The Center for Advanced Command Concepts and Technology (ACT). (1995, Nov.). Operations Other Than War (OOTW): The Technological Dimension. Washington, DC: National Defense University.
[161] Chemical Weap ons Convention Bulletin. (1994, Mar.), 23.
[162] Chief of the Defence Staff, Canada. (1976, 1 Sep.). Riot Control Agent Dibenz (b,f) -1, 4 - Oxazepine (CR). Canadian Force Technical Order. NSN 1365-21-873-1605. C-77-206-000/AF-000.
[163] Chicago Police Department, Training Division. (1961). Tear Gas Manual. Chicago, Illinois.
[164] Cline, Ray S. (1991, 27 Feb.). Warfare's New Era. Washington Times, 58.
[165] Coates, Joseph F. (1972, Jun.). Non-le thal Police Weap ons. Technology Review, 49-56.
[166] Coates, Joseph F. (1972). Nonle thal, Nondestructive Warfare. P-569. Arlington, Virginia: Institute for Defense Analyses.
[167] Coates, Joseph F. (1970). Nonle thal and Nondestructive com bat in Cities Overseas. Washington, District of Columbia: Institute for Defense Analyses, Science and Technology Division.
[168] Coates, Joseph F. (1969). Nonle thal Chemical Agents. Washington, District of Columbia: International Association of Chiefs of Police.
[169] Coates, Joseph F. (1968, May.). Safe Police Weap ons. Science and Technology, (77).
[170] Coates, Joseph F. (1967, Nov.). Nonle thal Weap ons for Use by Law Enforcement Officers. Study No. S-271. Arlington, Virginia: Institute for Defense Analysis, Science and Technology Division.
[171] Collins, John M. (1995, 14 Sep.). Nonle thal Weap ons and Operations: Potential Applications and Practical Limitations. CRS Report for Congress 95-974 S. Washington, District of Columbia: Congressional Research Service.
[172] Commandant's Warfighting Lab (CWL). (1995, Dec.). Draft Non-le thal Technology Functional Concept. Quantico, Virginia: United States Marine Corps. Under Redraft.
[173] Commodity Management Office, Department of the Army. (1969, Jul.). Riot-Control-Agent CS, Munitions and Dispersers. Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland.
[174] Computerworld. (1990-1991, 24 Dec.-1 Jan.). Joy to the World, 24, 72. Computer viruses as nonle thal Weap ons.
[175] Conine, Ernest. (1975, 26 Sep.). A Nonle thal Substitute for the Handgun? Los Angeles Times.
[176] Cook III, USAF. Maj. Joseph W, Fiely, USAF. Maj. David P. & McGowan, USAF. Maj. Maura T. (1995, Special Edition.). Nonle thal Weap ons: Technologies, Legalities, and Potential Policies. Airpower Journal, 9, (SE) 77-91.
[177] Cook, III. Maj. Joseph W. et al. (1994, 27 Jun.). Non-le thal Weap ons and Special Operations. For HQ USAF/XOXI. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado: USAF Institute for National Security Studies.
[178] Cook, Nick. (1992, 10 Oct.). Russia leads in "pulse" Weap ons. Jane's Defence Weekly, 18, (15) 5.
[179] Cooper, Pat & Holzer, Robert. (1996, 29 Apr.). Loophole Allows Officials to Deny Technology Funds (non-le thals). Defense News, 11, (17) 12.
[180] Cooper, Pat. (1996, 22-28 Jul.). DOD Guides Nonle thal Weap on Use. Defense News, 11, (29) 8.
[181] Cooper, Pat. (1995, 24 Jul.). Nonle thals Get Funding Plan: Senators Urge U.S. Military to Explore Technology. Defense News, 10, 18.
[182] Cooper, Pat. (1995, 27 Feb.-5 Mar.). U.S. Tests Nonle thal Weap on Policy in Somalia. Defense News, 10, 28.
[183] Cooper, Pat & Erlich, Jeff. (1996, 5-11 Feb.). U.S. Troops to Field Shortstop Against Shells in Bosnia. Defense News, 11, 22.
[184] Cooper, Pat & Opall, Barbara. (1994, 19-25 Sep.). Perry Plans to Launch Nonle thal Warfare Effort. Defense News, 9, 6.
[185] Cooper, Pat & Opall, Barbara. (1994, 10 Oct.). Perry seeks directive on nonle thal warfare feat. Army Times, 34.
[186] Council for Science and Society. (1978). Harmless Weap ons. Chichester, Great Britain.
[187] County of San Diego Office of The Medical Examiner.(1994, 1 Jul.). Autopsy Report on Daniel Lee Price ME#94-1204.
[188] Craig, F.N. et al. (1960, Jun.). Breathing patterns during exposure to CS. U.S. Army Chemical Warfare Laboratories Rep. CW2-2399.
[189] Creasy, W.M. (1958, May.-Jun.). Toxicological Warfare. Ordnance, 42.
[190] Crichton, D. (1959). A study of the toxicity of CS. Porton Tech. Paper 672.
[191] Crichton, D. et al. (1959, declassified 1968, Jun.). Agents for riot control: the selection of T. 792 (o-chlorobenzal malonoitrile) as a candidate agent to replace CN. Porton Tech. Paper 651.
[192] Crime Control Digest. (1992, 30 Nov.). Detroit, LAPD, 26, (48). Studying Use of Non-le thal Weap ons.
[193] Criminal Justice Newsletter. (1994, 1 Aug.). California Agencies Search for Less-le thal Weap ons, 25, (15) 2.
[194] Crockett, Thompson S.(1969). Police Chemical Agents Manual. Washington. District of Columbia: International Association of Chiefs of Police.
[195] Cuadros, Jaime H. (1995, 24 May.). Non-le thal and Less-Than-le thal Weap ons. Advanced Weap on Systems AWJC-8.
[196] Cuadros, Jaime H. (1994, Jan.). Non-le thal Weap ons: Course Outline. Presented at the 7th ASLET International Training Seminar, Washington, District of Columbia. Hacienda Heights, California: Arts and Engineering.
[197] Cuadros, Jaime H. (1993, Nov.). Kinetic Energy Less-le thal Projectile Technology. Presented at the Non-le thal Defense Conference, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, Maryland. Hacienda Heights, California: Arts and Engineering.
[198] Cuadros, Jaime H. (1993, Sep.). Terminal Ballistics of Non-le thal Projectiles. Presented at 14th Annual Symposium on Ballistics, Quebec, Canada. Hacienda Heights, California: Arts and Engineering.
[199] Cuadros, Jaime H. (1993, 1 Jun.). A Training Manual for Flexible Baton Selection and Use. Hollister, California: MK Ballistic Systems.
[200] Cuadros, Jaime H. (1993, Apr.). A Comparison Between Rubber Bullets and Shot Bags. Hollister, California: MK Ballistic Systems.
[201] Cuadros, Jaime H. (1992, 30 Nov.-3 Dec.). A Non- le thal Projectile Concept for Military, Law Enforcement and Civilian Use. Presented at the Small Arms Division Meeting, American Defense Preparedness Association, San Antonio, Texas. Hacienda Heights, California: Arts and Engineering.
[202] Curtis, Liz. (1982). They Shoot Children: The Use of Rubber and Plastic Bullets in the North of Ireland. London, England: Information on Ireland.
[203] Daley, Dorthy E., Hayes, Roger M. & Swint, Lloyd, E. (1995, Jul.). Oleoresin capsicum: don't let the fancy name fool you (pepper spray). Corrections Today, 57, 24.
[204] Davidson, Keay. (1992, 2 Feb.). War without Death may be on its Way. San Francisco Examiner, 1.
[205] Davis, Malcolm. (1994, Apr.-May.). How to win wars without actually killing. Asia-Pacific Defense Reporter, 20, 36-37.
[206] Davis, Sherman L. (1970, Jun.). Riot Control Weap ons for the Vietnam War. Historical Monograph AMC 56M. Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland: Edgewood Arsenal, U.S. Army Munitions Command.
[207] de Bakker, et al. (1990, Aug.). Laser Weap ons at Sea. International Defense Review, 23, (8) 853-856.
[208] Debban, LtCol. Alan W. (1993, Spring). Disabling Systems: War-Fighting Option for the Future. Airpower Journal, 7, (1) 44-50.
[209] Debban, Alan W. (1993, 22 Feb.). Disabling Technologies and Applications. HQ USAF/XOXT Background Paper.
[210] De Caro, Chuck. (1994). Sats, Lies, and Video- Rape: The Soft War Handbook. McLean, Virginia: Aerobureau Corp.
[211] Defense Daily. (1994, 25 May.). DOD to Adopt Policy on Non-le thal Weap ons by Late 1994, 183, 301-302.
[212] Defense Electronics. (1995, March). Russians Continue Work on Sophisticated Acoustic Weap onry, 26, 12.
[213] Defense Electronics. (1992, Mar.). DOD Urged to Adopt Nonle thal Warfare Strategy, 24, 22.
[214] Defense Electronics. (1992, Mar.). Examples of Nonle thal Weap ons, 24, 22.
[215] Defense News. (1996, 8-14 Jul.). Countermine Technologies Flow From Increased Thre at, 10.
[216] Defense News. (1996, 10-16 Jun.). Olin Ordnance to Test Nonle thal Vehicle Trap, 11, (23) 27.
[217] Defense News. (1996, 6-12 May.). Open Door for Nonle thals, 11, (18) 18.
[218] Defense News. (1996, 11-17 Mar.). Nonle thal Technology Wins Commander Nod, 11, (10) 2.
[219] Defense News. (1995, 25 Sep.-1 Oct.). Laser Stance Is on Target, 26.
[220] Defense News. (1994, 19-25 Oct.). Military Studies Unusual Arsenal.
[221] Defense News. (1994, 19-25 Sep.). Perry Plans to Launch Nonle thal Warfare Effort, 6.
[222] Defense News. (1994, 28 Mar.-3 Apr.). DoD to Boost Nonle thal Options, 46.
[223] Defense News. (1994, 7-13 Feb.). Lasers, Viruses, May Rule No-Fly Sky Zone, 1, 45.
[224] Defense News. (1993, 22-28 Nov.). Non-le thal Weap ons Group Set to Form in March, 1, 14.
[225] Defense News. (1993, 11-17 Jan.). U.S. Explores Mind-Control Technology, 4, 29.
[226] Defense Week. (1994, 18 Jan.). CIA Asked to Review "Buck Rogers" Weap on, 6.
[227] Defense Week. (1992, 19 Oct.). Army Gives a Boost to Exotic Non-le thal Weap ons.
[228] de la Taille, Renaud. (1980). Brief Survey of Non-Wounding Anti-Riot Weap ons. FSTC-HT-1092-79. Charlottesville, Maryland: U.S. Army Foreign Science and Technology Center.
[229] Department of Defense Directive. (1996, 9 Jul.). Policy for Non-le thal Weap ons. No. 3000.3.
[230] Department of Defense. (1994, 14 Oct.). DOD Activities in Non-le thal Weap ons. 94-S-4521.
[231] Dettling, J.R. & Mawhinney, R.C. (1972, 2 Oct.). Stun-Gun Preliminary Terminal Effects Study. MB-R-72/77. San Ramon, California: MBA Associates.
[232] Dobbs, Herbert H. et al. (1990, Sep.). Assessment of Mission Kill Concept, Requirements, and Technologies. Prepared by System Planning Corporation, Arlington, Virginia. Washington, District of Columbia: Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency.
[233] Dworetzky, Tom. (1987, Nov.). Bag-em with the Un- Gun (Less-le thal Bean Bag Weap ons). Discover, 8, 26- 27.
[234] The Economist. (1994, 15 Oct.). Thou Shall Not Blind (inhumane laser guns). 333, (7885) 54.
[235] Edgewood Arsenal, MD, Directorate of Medical Research. (1983). Special Summary Report of Toxicology of CN, CS, and DM. Washington, District of Columbia: International Association of Chiefs of Police. First published in 1965, Sep.
[236] Edgewood Arsenal, MD. (1967, Oct.). Characteristics of Riot Control Agent CS. EASP 600-1/AD 661 319. Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland: Department of the Army.
[237] Egner, D.O. & Williams, L.W. (1975). Standard Scenarios for the Less le thal Weap ons Evaluation Model. Technical Memorandum 20-75. Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory.
[238] Egner, D.O. & Campbell, D.(1975, Aug.). Testing and Evaluation of Chemical Weap ons. Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland: U.S. Army Land Warfare Laboratory.
[239] Egner, D.O. et al. (1974, May.). The Effectiveness of Less le thal Weap ons Utilizing Chemical Agents. Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory.
[240] Egner, D.O. et al. (1973). A Multidisciplinary Technique for the Evaluation of Less le thal Weap ons. Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland: U.S. Army Land Warfare Laboratory.
[241] Ellis, R.H. & Kellog, J.C. (1966, Sep.). Implications of the Use of Incapacitating Agents in Warfare. Report No. 7675-2225 submitted to Headquarters, U.S. Air Force, Washington D.C., under contract No. AF 49 (638)-1584. Hartford, Connecticut: Travelers Research Center.
[242] Ehmke, Charles. (1966). The Use of Non-le thal Chemical Agents in Limited Warfare. Thesis. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air Command and Staff College.
[243] Epstein, J.S. & Kelso, M.A. (1995, 14 Mar.). Non-le thal Weap ons, An Overview of Policy and Technology. Slide Series. Center for International Security and Arms Control, Stanford University.
[244] Evancoe, Paul. (1994, Jun.). Tomorrow's Weap ons of Choice? Military Technology, 18, 68-71.
[245] Evancoe, Paul. (1994, May.-Jun.). Non-le thal Alternatives Weighed by Law Officers. National Defense, 73, (498) 28-30.
[246] Evancoe, Paul. (1993, Dec.). Non-le thal Technologies Enhance Warrior's Punch. National Defense, 73, (493) 26-29.
[247] Evancoe, Paul & Bentley, Mark. (1994, May). CVW: Computer Virus as a Technology Weap on. Military Technology, 18, 38-40.
[248] Evers, Stacey. (1993, 19 Nov.). Police, Prisons Want Cheap Non-le thal Technologies. Aerospace Daily, 299.
[249] Facts on File. (1995, 19 Oct.). Blinding Laser Weap on Ban Implemented. 55, (2864) 781.
[250] Faul, Denis. (1982, Oct.). Plastic Bullets- Plastic Government: Deaths and Injuries by Plastic Bullets, August 1981- October 1982.
[251] Ferretti, F. (1976, 4 Jan.). Zap! New York Times Magazine, 13-16.
[252] Fetter, Gregory. (1992, 22 Apr.). The Ring Airfoil Grenade- A Weap on Whose Time Has Come. World Weap ons Review, (134), 5-8.
[253] Fischetti, Mark. (1995, Jan.). Less-Than-le thal Weap ons. Technology Review, 98, (1) 14-15.
[254] Flatau, Abraham et al. (1974). Summary of Technical Presentations for the STING RAG Validation In-Process Review and Soft RAG-Concept Feasibility In-Process Review. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Armament Command.
[255] Flatau, Abraham. (1976, 15-16 Sep.). The XM234 Launcher Adapter for M16 Rifle. Unedited Preliminary Summary Report. Presented at the 1976 Annual Meeting, Small Arms Systems Division, American Defense Preparedness Association, Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, New Jersey.
[256] Florig, H. Keith. (1988, Mar.). The future battlefield: a blast of gigawatts? IEEE Spectrum, 25, (3) 50- 54.
[257] Fortune. (1994, 11 Jul.). How Cops will Rearm, Tom Clancy Style, 16.
[258] Foster-Miller, Inc. A. Mangolds. (1990). Soft Kill of Fielded Weap ons Systems. Weston, Massachusetts.
[259] Frost, Dr. Gerald & Shipbaugh, Dr. Calvin. (1994, 1 Feb.). GPS Targeting for Non-le thal Systems. RAND Publication RP-262, Santa Monica, California: The RAND Corporation.
[260] Fulghum, David A. (1994, 19 Sep.). Air Force May Delay JPATS, TSSAM (Carbon-Fiber Weap on). Aviation Week & Space Technology, 141, (12) 26-27.
[261] Fulghum, David A. (1993, 24 May.). EMP Weap ons Lead Race for Non-le thal Technology. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 138, (21) 61.
[262] Fulghum, David A. (1993, 22 Feb.). ALCMS Given Nonle thal Role (air-launched cruise missiles fitted with electromagnetic pulse generators). Aviation Week & Space Technology, 138, (8) 20-22.
[263] Fulghum, David A. (1992, 17 Aug.). US Weighs Use of Nonle thal Weap ons in Serbia If U.N. Decides to Fight. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 137, (7) 62-63.
[264] Fulghum, David A. (1992, 27 Apr.). Secret Carbon- Fiber Warheads Blinded Iraqi Air Defenses. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 136, (17) 18-20.
[265] Fulton, Roger. (1995, Sep.). The Law Enforcement Technology Network. Law Enforcement Technology, 26.
[266] Fulton, Roger. (1995, Sep.). When Law Enforcement Met Industry...Transferring Military Technology. Law Enforcement Technology, 56.
[267] Futrell, A. (1988). History and development of the side-handle baton power strike and the PPCT side- handle baton system. Millstadt, Illinios: PPCT Research Publications.
[268] Gallego, F. & Daly, M. (1990, 13 Jan.). Laser Weap on in Royal Navy service. Jane's Defence Weekly.
[269] Galston, A.W. (1968, Jun.). Military uses of herbicides in Vietnam. The New Scientist.
[270] Galston, A.W. (1967, Aug.-Sep.). Changing the environment: herbicides in Vietnam. Scientist and Citizen, 2.
[271] Garwin, Richard L. (1994, Oct.). Secret Weap ons for the CNN Era. Harper's, 289, (1773) 17-18.
[272] Gee, USA. Maj. Robert W. (1994, Dec.). Military Police Nonle thal Technology Program. Briefing Slides. Battle Lab Support Division. Fort McClellan, Alabama: U.S. Military Police School.
[273] General Ordnance Equipment Corporation. (1968). A Series of Reports on Chemical Mace Non-le thal Weap ons.
[274] Gips, Michael. (1995, Apr.). One-stop shop. Security Management, 39 (4) 11. Law enforcement database (less-than le thal).
[275] Goldblat, J. (1970, Apr.). Are tear gas Weap ons and herbicides permitted Weap ons? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 26.
[276] Gongwer, L.E. et al. (1958, Nov.). The comparative effectiveness of four riot control agents. U.S. Army Chemical Warfare Laboratories Tech. Memo. CWL-TM-24-18.
[277] Goodman, Jr. Glenn W. (1994, Jul.). Upping the Nonle thal Ante: Pentagon Funds A New Weap ons Initiative. Armed Forces Journal International, 131, (12) 13.
[278] Goodman, Jr. Glenn W. (1988, May.). US Electronic Systems Highly Vulnerable to Radio-Frequency Beam Weap ons. Armed Forces Journal International, 87, (10) 20.
[279] Gourley, Scott R. (1995, Apr.). The Sniper's Latest Nightmare. International Defense Review, 66.
[280] Gray, Jan M. (1995, 17 Jul.). Uses of Nonle thal Force in Army Operations. White paper, draft. Fort Monroe, Virginia: US Army Training and Doctrine Command.
[281] Grossman, Elaine M. (1994, 15 Apr.). Pentagon to Set Priorities in Non-le thal Technologies, Weap ons. Inside the Air Force, 1.
[282] Grossman, Jon. (1991, Jul.). Military Lasers: A Costly Search for Ultimate Weap ons. Photonics Spectra, 25, (7) 84-92.
[283] Grudowski, Mike. (1995, 13 Apr.). Not-so-le thal Weap ons (police Weap ons). New York Times Magazine, 40-41.
[284] Gunther, Judith, Suzanne, Kantra & Langreth, Robert N. (1994, Sep.). The Digital Warrior. Popular Science, 245, 60-64.
[285] Gurganious, Joseph T. (1974). Riot Control Barrier: Concept Development and Feasibility Test. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Land Warfare Laboratory.
[286] Gutentag, P.J. & Hart, J. (1960, Apr.). The evaluation of CS aerosols as a riot control agent in man. U.S. Army Chemical Warfare Laboratories Rep. CWL-2365.
[287] Hammick, Murray. (1991, Aug.). Laser protection for AFV's: the eyes have it. International Defense Review, 818-821.
[288] Hanley, William C. (1968). Berkeley Police Department Use of Chemical Mace. City Manager Report No. 68-37. Berkeley, California.
[289] Hannant, Philip. (1977). Nonle thal Weap ons for Law Enforcement. Thesis. Central Missouri State University.
[290] Hansen, George. (1966). Non-le thal Gases for Guerrilla Warfare. Professional Study. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air War College.
[291] Harris, Bill. (1993, May.). Less-than-le thal munitions to give Army greater flexibility. Ordnance, 22-23.
[292] Hartford Democrat/AP News. (1978, 20 Dec.). At CSL 1978 Was A Year of Advances: Riot Control Device & New Army Weap on (Sting RAG).
[293] Hayeslip, Ph.D. David W. & Preszler, Ph.D. Alan. (1993, Mar.). NIJ Initiative on Less-Than-le thal Weap ons. NCJ 133523. Research in Brief.
[294] Headquarters, Department of the Army. (1993). Grenade, Hand: Riot Control, CS, ABC-M7A3, (1330-6963), Ammunition Surveillance Procedures. Supply Bulletin; SB 742-1330-94-322. Washington, District of Columbia.
[295] Headquarters, Department of the Army. (1989). Operator's Manual: Cartridge, 40-Millimeter, Riot Control CS, XM674 and Cartridge, 40-Millimeter, Red Smoke RS, XM675. Tecnical Manual; TM 3- 1310-244-10. Washington, District of Columbia.
[296] Headquarters United States Air Force, Special Technical Plans Division. (1991, 13 Sep.). Position Paper on the Air Force Role in Development of Disabling Systems/Strategy.
[297] Heal, Sid. (1994, Win.). Diversionary Devices: "Down and Dirty." The Tactical Edge, 26-30.
[298] Heal, Sid. (1990, Spr.). Flashbangs: Why and How, Part III. The Tactical Edge, 7-11.
[299] Heal, Sid.(1990, Win.). Flashbangs: Why and How, Part II. The Tactical Edge, 20-22.
[300] Heal, Sid. (1990, Jul.). Flashbangs: Effective Use of Diversionary Devices. The Police Chief, 18-24.
[301] Heal, Sid. (1989, Fal.). Flashbangs: Why and How. The Tactical Edge, 9-11.
[302] Heal, Sid & Evancoe, Paul. (1996, Sep.-Oct.). Nonle thal Disabling Technology: A Future Reality. Police and Security News, 3-16.
[303] Heal, Charles S. & Kolman, John. (1989). Flash/Sound Diversionary Devices. Training Key #391, 17. Alexandria, Virginia: International Association of Chiefs of Police.
[304] Hearing on Public Sale of Protective Sprays. (1969). Consumer Subcommittee on Commerce, 91st Congress, First Session.
[305] Hecht, Jeff. (1992, Aug.). Lasers Designed to Blind. New Scientist, 135, (1833) 27-31.
[306] Hellreich, A. et al. (1967, Jan.). The effects of thermally-generated CS aerosols on human skin. Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report. 4075, AD809485.
[307] Hemenway, David & Weil, Douglas. (1990, Win.). Phasers on Stun: The Case for Less le thal Weap ons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 9, (1) 94-98.
[308] Herby, Peter. (1995, Mar.-Apr.). Outlaw blinding: Weap ons intended to blind soldiers on the battlefield must, like chemical and biological Weap ons, be banned. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 51, (2) 4.
[309] Herskovitz, Don. (1993, Aug.). Killing Them Softly. Journal of Defense Electronics, 16, 41-42.
[310] Heun, Christopher T. (1996, Sep.). Holograms Halt Contraband; New Sensor Detects Bombs (Saber 203 Info). National Defense, 81, (520), 19.
[311] Higgins, John. (1967). Non-le thal Chemical Weap ons in Counterinsurgency. Thesis. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air Command and Staff College.
[312] Hiltermann, Joost & Arkin, William. (1995, 23 Oct.). No Blinding Lasers. Defense News, 29. Letters to the Editor.
[313] Himmelspach, Darlene. (1995, 18 Oct.). Leathernecks' new devices are not deadly, but they're effective. San Diego Union-Tribune, Internet.
[314] Himsworth, Sir H. et al. (1971). Report of the enquiry into the medical and toxicological aspects of CS. Part II. London, England: Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
[315] Hoffman, Lisa. (1996, 10 Aug.). Pentagon backs use of nonle thal Weap ons. The San-Diego Union Tribune, A-25.
[316] Holland, P. (1974). Cutaneous Reactions Produced by Dibenz-(b,f)-1,4-oxazepine (CR). British Journal of Dermatology.
[317] Holzer, R. & Munro, N. (1992, 13-19 Apr.). Microwave Weap on stuns Iraqis. Defense News, 1.
[318] Horgan, John. (1994, Apr.). Bang! You're Alive: An unusual trio wins support for "nonle thal" Weap ons. Scientific American, 270, (4) 22-24.
[319] House, W.B. et al. (1967, Dec.). Assessment of the ecological effects of extensive or repeated use of herbicides. Midwest Research Institute Report. AD 824314.
[320] Howard, Stuart & Hitt, William D. (1966, 2 May.). Intercultural differences in olfaction. ARPA-Project AGILE Report. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Memorial Institute.
[321] Hu, Howard, et al. (1989, 4 Aug.). Tear Gas: Harassing Agent or Toxic Chemical Weap on. Journal of the American Medical Association, 262, 660.
[322] Huddle, F.P. (1969). Technology-assessment of the Vietnam defoliant matter; a case history. U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, 91st. Congress., Cie. on Science and Astronautics.
[323] Hunter, John C. (1994, May.). Pepper Spray. Focus on Use of Force. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 63, 24-26.
[324] Hunter, USAF. Maj. Roger C. (1994, Fal.). Disabling Systems and the Air Force. Airpower Journal, 7, (3) 43-47.
[325] Hurlburt, T.D. Beaulieu, M., & Pickman, S. (1985, Jul.). An evaluation of use force--Part II: Non-deadly force. The Program Evaluation Section, Orlando Police Department.
[326] Hust, Gerald. (1994). Taking Down Communications. Thesis. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: School of Advanced Airpower Studies.
[327] Ingram, J.T. (1942, Dec.). Dermatitis from exposure to tear gas. The British Journal of Dermatology, 54.
[328] Inside the Army. (1995, 31 Jul.). Draft Concept for Non-le thal Capabilities in Army Operations, 18-19.
[329] Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis. (1996, May.). Nonle thal Weap ons: Emerging Requirements for Security Strategy. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
[330] Institute for Law and Justice. (1995, Jan.). Law Enforcement Options. Newsletter on Less-Than-le thal Technology Development, 1, (1) 1-8.
[331] International Association of Chiefs of Police. (1970-1971). Police Center Weap ons Report Series. Washington, District of Columbia.
[332] International Association of Chiefs of Police. (1970). Police Chemical Munitions Handbook. Riot Control Agent Information Series No. 03-1. Washington, District of Columbia.
[333] International Association of Chiefs of Police. (1970). Tactical Use of Riot Agents. Riot Control Agent Information Series No. 04-1. Washington, District of Columbia.
[334] International Association of Chiefs of Police. (1970). Aerosol Irritant Projectors: A National Survey. Gaithersburg, Maryland. See also The Police Chief. (1970, Jan.).
[335] International Association of Chiefs of Police, Professional Standards Division. (1969). The Evaluation of CS Aerosols as a Riot-Control Agent in Man. Washington, District of Columbia. Originally Issued in April 1960 by U.S. Army Chemical Corps Research and Development Command, Chemical Warfare Laboratories.
[336] International Association of Chiefs of Police, Police Weap ons Center. (1968). Selected Military Reports on CS Riot Control Agents. Gaithersburg, Maryland.
[337] International Association of Chiefs of Police, Professional Standards Division. (1967). Characteristics of Riot Control Agent CS. Washington, District of Columbia.
[338] International Defense Review. (1995, Nov.). More Less-Than le thal Weap onry for US, 28, 14.
[339] International Defense Review. (1994, Jul.). Less Than le thal, 27, (7) 29.
[340] Isenberg, David. (1996, Spr.). Forum: Nonle thal Weap ons. Issues in Science and Technology, 12, (3) 15-16.
[341] Jackson, L. (1989). The effect of Tennessee vs. Garner on the use of deadly force by non-sworn private security personnel. Millstadt, Illinois: PPCT Research Publications.
[342] Jamieson, J.P., Hull, R. & Battershill, P. (1990, Jul.). Recommendations of the Committee on the Use of Less Than le thal Force by Police Officers in British Columbia. British Columbia Police Commission.
[343] Janes Infantry Weap ons. (1989). Ring Airfoil Civil Disturbance Control System, 495.
[344] JAYCOR. (1994, 19 Sep.). Policy Study: Non- le thal Technologies. Washington, District of Columbia.
[345] Jolley, H.W. & Carpenter, W.L. (1968, Feb.). Tear gas dermatitis. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 203.
[346] Jones, Anita. (1995, 4 Dec.). ARPA Has Mission. Defense News, 26. Letters to the Editor.
[347] Jones, G.R.N. (1971, Jun.). CS in the balance. New Scientist and Science Journal, 203.
[348] Journal of Electronic Defense. (1993, Aug.). The Sound of Waco, 16, 42. Using sound as a nonle thal Weap on.
[349] Kalman, S.M. (1970, 28 May.). Drugs as Weap ons. Seminar paper, Department of Bio-chemistry, U.C. Berkeley.
[350] Kerby, M. (1988). Analysis of impact Weap on power and energy duration of batons. Millstadt, Illinois: PPCT Research Publications.
[351] Kiernan, Vincent. (1994, 19 Nov.). 'Ban Cruel Laser Weap ons' Says Red Cross. New Scientist, 144, 11.
[352] Kiernan, Vincent. (1994, Sep.). Lasers seen as an aid to law enforcement. Laser Focus World, 30, (9) 49-50.
[353] Kiernan, Vincent. (1993, 11 Dec.). War over Weap ons that can't kill. New Scientist, 140, (1903) 14-16.
[354] Klaaren, USAF. Maj. Jonathan W. & Mitchell, USAF. Maj. Ronald S. (1995, Spe.). Nonle thal Technology and Airpower: A Winning Combination for Strategic Paralysis. Airpower Journal, 9, (SE) 42-51. Excerpt from a 1993 Air Command and Staff College research project authored by Chingono, Maj. Biltim, et al.
[355] Knoth, Arthur. (1995, Oct.). Laserpainting the battlefield. International Defense Review, 79.
[356] Knoth, Arthur. (1994, Jul.). Disabling Technologies: A Critical Assessment. International Defense Review, 33-39.
[357] Kornblum, Ronald N. & Reddy, Sara K. (1991). Effects of the Taser in Fatalities Involving Police Confrontation. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 36, (2) 434.
[358] Koscove, Eric M. (1985, Dec.). The Taser Weap on: A New Emergency Medical Problem. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 14, 112.
[359] Kunze, Douglas R. (1995, May.-Jun.). Denial Systems Deflect Terrorists from Mischief. National Defense, 55-56.
[360] Lancet (North American Edition). (1994, 17 Dec.). Weap ons Intended to Blind, 344, 1649-1650.
[361] Langreth, Robert. (1994, Oct.). Soft Kill. Popular Science, 245, (4) 66-69.
[362] Laser Focus World. (1996, Jun.). Laser Industry Report: Blinding Laser Weap ons Ban in Question?, 32, (6) 67.
[363] Laser Focus World. (1993, Sep.). Washington Report: Lets Debate Laser Weap ons, 29, (9) 65.
[364] Law Enforcement News. (1996, 31 Mar.). Civil liberties group wants FDA-style regulations-and more- for OC spray, 22, (442) 1, 6.
[365] Law Enforcement News. (1996, 31 Mar.). Philly reports no problem with OC, 22, (442) 6.
[366] Law Enforcement News. (1996, 31 Jan.). The eyes have it...OC spray is NYC cops' Weap on of choice, 22, (438).
[367] Law Enforcement Technology (1995, Nov.). Surveillance and Weap ons Detection, 5.
[368] Law Enforcement Technology (1995, Nov.). Weap ons and Protective Systems, 10.
[369] Lawson, Chris. (1995, 17 Apr.). Words from a rising star. Navy Times, 16. Marine Corps Edition.
[370] Leakey, Robert J. (1968). Utilization of Chemical Agents and Their Application to Civil Disturbances. Thesis. Washington State University.
[371] Levine, Robert A. & Stahl, Charles J. (1968, Apr.). Eye Injury Caused by Tear-Gas Weap ons. American Journal of Ophthalamology, 65, 497.
[372] Lewer, Nick. (1995). Non-le thal Weap ons. Medicine and War, 11, (2) 78.
[373] Libby, Hildi S. (1996, 6-7 Mar.). Coordinated Army Non le thal Program Overview. In American Defense Preparedness Association. Non-le thal Defense II Conference: Proceedings & Updated Attendee Roster. Alexander, Chair. John B. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Tysons Corner, McLean, Virginia.
[374] Linder, USA. Maj. Jim. (1995). Nonle thal Weap ons: Direct Employment Against Non-com batants in MOOTW. Unpublished Research Paper. Newport, Rhode Island: US Naval War College.
[375] Livingston, Neil C. (1995, 1 Sep.). Dazzling Achievements. Sea Power, 38, (9) 43.
[376] Lorenz, F.M. (1996, Aut.). Non-le thal Force: The Slippery Slope to War? Parameters, 26, (3) 52-62.
[377] Lorenz, Col. F.M. (1995, Nov.-Dec.). Forging Rules of Engagement: Lessons Learned in Operation United Shield. Military Review, 75, (6) 17-25.
[378] Lorenz, Col. Frederick M. (1995, Sep.). "Less- le thal" Force in Operation United Shield. Marine Corps Gazette, 79, (9) 68-76.
[379] Los Angeles Times. (1994, 20 Dec.). Not So Deadly Weap ons, A4.
[380] Los Angeles Times. (1995, 13 Oct.). Pentagon Cancels Controversial Laser, A16.
[381] Lynch, Gregory R. (1995). The Role of Non-le thal Weap ons in "Special Wars." Thesis. Monterey, California: Naval Post Graduate School.
[382] Maclean's. (1995, 6 Mar.). Sticky 'Em Up, 108, 11. Marines use sticky foam in Somalia
[383] Macleod, Ian F., Villarreal, J.E. & Seevers, M.H. (1968, Jun.). Report on Mark IV Chemical Mace. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Medical School.
[384] Madden, J.F. (1951, Jan.). Cutaneous hypersensitivity to tear gas (CN), a case report. The American Medical Association Archives of Dermatology and Syhpilology, 63.
[385] Mahan, Jim. (1996, 6-7 Mar.). Prison Requirements. In American Defense Preparedness Association. Non-le thal Defense II Conference: Proceedings & Updated Attendee Roster. Alexander, Chair. John B. The Ritz-Carlton Hotel, Tysons Corner, McLean, Virginia.
[386] Manley, Harriot. (1993, Mar.). Guide to Self- Defense Devices. Good Housekeeping, 27, 28-30.
[387] Mar, Roland K. (1986, Sep.). Bang-Less Tank Killer. U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 112, (19) 112-113.
[388] Marconi, Andrew. (1974, Dec.). What's New on the Beat. Mechanix Illustrated.
[389] Marine Corps com bat Development Command (MCCDC). (1996, Nov.). Joint Concept for Nonle thal Weap ons. Draft. Quantico, Virginia.
[390] Marine Corps Gazette. (1996, Jun.). Lab to Hold Nonle thals Experiment, 80, (6) 6.
[391] Marine Corps Gazette. (1996, May.). Corps Leads Nonle thal Weap ons Program, 80, (5) 6.
[392] Marine Corps Systems Command (1996). Nonle thal Weap ons Program. Briefing Slides & Draft Memorandum. Quantico, Virginia.
[393] Margolis, R.J. (1974, 8 Dec.). Stun guns, bean bags and dumdums. Washington Post.
[394] Martin, USN. Capt. M.D. (1991, 29 May). Non- le thal Weap ons. Policy Planning Paper. Office of the Under- Secretary of Defense (Policy).
[395] Matthews, William. (1994, 11 Apr.). Crimebusters! Cops put defense technology to work. Air Force Times, 31.
[396] Mayer, J. (1966). Crop destruction in Vietnam. Science, 152.
[397] MBA Associates. (1970, 24 Jul.). Technical Memorandum: Non-le thal Projectile. MB-TM-70 12-2. San Ramon, California.
[398] MCCDC, Concepts Division, Nonle thal Coordination Cell. (1996). Marine Corps Systems Command: Nonle thal Weap ons Program. Brief. Quantico, Virginia.
[399] McConnell, A.F. (1970). Mission: Ranch Hand. Air University Review, 21.
[400] McGrew, Dan. (1996, 22 Apr.). The Name of the Game is Killing. Navy Times, 46, (29) 54. Marine Corps Edition.
[401] Meadows, Sandra I. (1996, Jul.-Aug.). Warfighters Want Weap ons That Disable But Don't Kill. National Defense, 81, (519) 24.
[402] Meadows, Sandra I. & Williams, Robert H. (1995, May.-Jun.). Movable Systems Shepherded Course of Defense Security. National Defense, 52.
[403] Mechanical Engineering. (1994, Apr.). Lawbreakers Beware the Web of Justice, 116, (4) 86.
[404] Memorandum of Agreement between the United States Army and United States Marine Corps for Non-le thal Weap ons Development, Test & Evaluation and Fielding. (1996).
[405] Merchant, Julie. (1994, Jul.). Thre at Weap ons and Weap ons Technologies: Implications for Army SOF. Special Warfare, 7, 32-39.
[406] Meselson, M. (1971, Mar.). Tear gas in Vietnam and the return of poison gas. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 27.
[407] Meyer-Arendt, Jurgen R. (1968, Mar.). Efficiency and Limitations of Lasers as Weap ons. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, 188-191.
[408] Meyer, Sgt. Greg. (1992, Aug.). Nonle thal Weap ons vs. Conventional Police Tactics: Assessing Injuries and Liabilities. The Police Chief, 59, (8) 10-17.
[409] Meyer, Greg. (1991). Nonle thal Weap ons versus Conventional Police Tactics. Thesis. Los Angeles, California: California State University, Los Angeles.
[410] Michigan State University, Vietnam Advisory Group (Saigon, Vietnam). (1959). Tear Gas Training Manual. Reports and Documents, Ser. 2, No. 39. Saigon, East Lansing: Michigan State University.
[411] Miller, Craig. (1994, 1 Jul.). Poway Man Dies After Hit With Spray. San Diego Times Advocate, B1.
[412] Miller, W.L. (1964, Nov.-Dec.). Smoke'em out! Ordnance, 64.
[413] Miller, W.L. (1964, Jul.). Chemicals vs. guerrillas. Marine Corps Gazette, 48.
[414] Mohr, USAF. Capt. George C., et al. (1965, Sep.). Effects of Low Frequency and Infrasonic Noise on Man. Aerospace Medicine, 36, (9) 817-824.
[415] Morehouse, Maj. David A. (1992). A New Strategic Era: A Case for Nonle thal Weap ons. Thesis. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College.
[416] Morgan, J.P. (1992, Aug.). Oleoresin Capsicum. The Police Chief, 59, 22-23.
[417] Morris, Chris & Janet. (1995, 13 Nov.). End Battle Over Nonle thals: Congress Must Heed Call for Needed Weap ons. Defense News, 40.
[418] Morris, Chris & Janet, & Baines, Thomas. (1995, Spring). Weap ons of Mass Protection: Nonle thality, Information Warfare, and Airpower in the Age of Chaos. Airpower Journal, 9, (1) 15-29.
[419] Morris, Janet & Morris, Chris. (1990, 1994). Nonle thality: A Global Strategy. West Hyannis Port, Massachusetts: Morris & Morris.
[420] Morris, Chris & Morris, Janet. (1994). Nonle thality: An Overview. West Hyannis Port, Massachusetts: Morris & Morris.
[421] Morris, Chris & Morris, Janet. (1993). Nonle thality and Psyops. West Hyannis Port, Massachusetts: Morris & Morris.
[422] Morris, Janet & Morris, Chris. (1992). Creating an Office of Nonle thality: A New Paradigm for a New Era. Washington, District of Columbia: US Global Strategy Council.
[423] Morris, Janet., Krivorotov, Victor & Morris, Chris. (1992). The Age of Chaos. West Hyannis Port, Mass.: Morris & Morris.
[424] Morris, Janet & Morris, Chris. (1991). Nonle thality: Development of a National Policy and Employing Nonle thal Means in a New Strategic Era. Washington, District of Columbia: US Global Strategy Council.
[425] Morris, Janet. (1991, Sep.). Enter Nonle thal Weap onry. IEEE Spectrum, 28, (9) 58.
[426] Morris, Janet & Morris, Chris. (1990). Toward a Nonle thal Strategy. West Hyannis Port, Massachusetts: Morris & Morris.
[427] Morrison, David C. (1995). More-Than-le thal Weap ons. National Journal, 27, (29) 1919.
[428] Morrison, David C. (1994, Oct.). Crime-Fighting 2001. Government Executive, 26, 42-44.
[429] Morrison, David C. (1994, 16 Apr.). Robocops. National Journal, 26, (16) 889-893.
[430] Morrison, David. (1992, 7 Nov.). War Without Death? National Journal, 24, (45) 2589.
[431] Morrison, David C. (1992, 6 Jun.). Alternatives to Bashing. National Journal, 24, (23) 1358-1360.
[432] Morrison, David C. (1992, 28 Mar.). Bang! Bang! You've been inhibited. National Journal, 24, (13) 758-759.
[433] Morrison, David. (1989, May.). Tactical Laser Weap ons. Lasers and Optics.
[434] Morrison, David C. (1987, 14 Mar.). Snow Jobs (emulsifying agents). National Journal, 19, (11) 651.
[435] Morrison, David C. (1987, 4 Mar.). When Eyes Become the Targets. National Journal, 19, (14) 822-823.
[436] Morrison, David C. (1985, May.). Laser Weap ons Come Down to Earth; Their Targets Electronic and Human Eyes. High Technology, 5, 69-70.
[437] Munro, N. & Opall, B. (1992, 19-25 Oct.). Military studies unusual arsenal. Defense News, 3.
[438] Munro, N. (1990, 5 Mar.). Army tests hand-held laser rifles. Defense News.
[439] National Institute of Justice. (1995, Sep.). New Technologies Demonstrated for Law Enforcement. Technology Beat, 1-5.
[440] National Institute of Justice, Office of Science and Technology. (1995, 18 Sep.). Matrix of Law Enforcement Technology Requirements, Studies, Evaluations & Standards (Draft).
[441] National Institute of Justice. (1995, 14 Jun.). CJ Management & Training Digest, 1 (11) 1-4. Focuses on Nonle thal Weap ons.
[442] National Institute of Justice. (1995, Jan.). NIJ Awards in Fiscal Year 1994. NCJ 152109. Research in Brief. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office, 9, 11- 13.
[443] National Institute of Justice. (1985, Sep.). Hand-Held Aerosol Tear Gas Weap ons. Technology Assessment Program, NIJ Standard 0110.00. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[444] National Institute of Justice. (1985, Sep.). Barrier-Penetrating Tear Gas Munitions. Technology Assessment Program, NIJ Standard 0111.00. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[445] Navy Times (1996, 5 Aug.). Nonle thals get official DoD nod. Marine Corps Edition., 24.
[446] Navy Times. (1995, 9 Oct.). Special Ops pulls blind laser. Marine Corps Edition., 32.
[447] Navy Times. (1995, 27 Feb.). Corps hopes a little goo goes a long way there. Marine Corps Edition., 3.
[448] Neild, R. & Robison, Perry J. (1970, 15 Feb.). Tear gas: a blunder. The Sunday Times.
[449] Neven, Thomas E. (1993, Dec.). Nonle thal Weap ons: Expanding Our Options. Marine Corps Gazette, 77, (12) 61-62.
[450] New Scientist. (1973, 29 Mar.). Anti-crowd Weap ons work by causing fits 57, (839) 726.
[451] New Scientist. (1973, 20 Sep). 'Squawk box' technology. 59, (864) 667.
[452] New Scientist. (1973, 20 Sep). Army tests new riot Weap on. 59, (864) 684.
[453] Nicholson, Thomas Gerald. (1969). The Use of Chemical Mace by Army Military Policemen. Staff Study ASDIRS, 3079. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College.
[454] Nollinger, Mark. (1995, Feb.). Surrender or We'll Slime You. Wired, 3, 90.
[455] Noorani, A.G. (1995). Landmines and Blinding Laser Weap ons. Economic and Political Weekly, 30, (48).
[456] O'Connell, USAF. Capt. Edward P. & Dillaplain, USAF. 1stLt. John. (1994, Win.). Nonle thal Concepts: Implications for Air Force Intelligence. Airpower Journal, 7, (4) 26-33.
[457] Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs). (1995, 1 Sep.). DOD Announces Policy on Blinding Lasers. Washington, District of Columbia.
[458] Official Journal of the European Communities: Information and Notices. (1995). Blinding Laser Weap ons, 38, (340) 39.
[459] Olmstead, Bob. (1975, 14 Sep.). For Crowd Control: A Stunning New Weap on. Chicago Sunday Sun-Times.
[460] Olson, Donald N. (1972, Aug.). A Kinetically Non-Hazardous Ring Airfoil Projectile for Delivering Riot Control Agent. EATM 2200-6. Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland: U.S. Army Munitions Command.
[461] O'Malley, MPC. Maj. Dennis J. (1974, Win.). 'Less-Than-le thal Firepower: A Possible Solution. MPLEJ, 16-17.
[462] Opall, Barbara. (1990, 5 Nov.). Labs Rush Nonle thal Arms for Mideast Deployment. Defense News, 1.
[463] Opall, Barbara. (1992, 17 Feb.). Pentagon Forges Strategy on Non-le thal Warfare. Defense News, 1, 50.
[464] Opall, Barbara. (1992, 2 Mar.). Pentagon Units Jostle Over Non-le thal Initiative. Defense News, 6.
[465] Opall, Barbara. (1994, 28 Mar.-3 Apr.). DoD to boost nonle thal options. Defense News, 46.
[466] Optics and Photonics News. (1995). Scatterings: Ethics of Laser Weap ons Questioned, 6, (8), 6.
[467] Ordog, Gary J., Wasserberger, Jonathan & Schater, Theodore., et al. (1987). Electronic Gun (Taser©) Injuries. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 16, 73-78.
[468] Orion International Technologies, Inc. (1989). Precision Guided Weap ons Countermeasures Test and Evaluation Directorate (OTD) Pamphlet 1-89.
[469] Page, J.A. (1969). Of 'Mace' and men: tort law as a means of controlling domestic chemical warfare. The Georgetown Law Review.
[470] Panique, Jr. Chester H. (1995, May.). What Methods will California Use to Identify and Inform Technology Developers of Their Needs by the Year 2004? Command College Graduate Project, Class 20, Center for Leadership Institute.
[471] Parks, W. Hays. (1988, Nov.). Memorandum of Law: The Use of Lasers as Antipersonnel Weap ons, The Army Lawyer, 3.
[472] Parlor, USMCR. Michael B. (1991, 29 May.). Non- le thal Weap ons: A Policy Planning Paper.
[473] Patel, Tara. (1995, 23 Sep.). US Fights Ban on Laser Warfare. New Scientist, 147, 6.
[474] Peak, Ken. (1990, Feb.). The Quest for Alternatives to le thal Force: A Heuristic View. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 6, (1) 8-22.
[475] Pengelley, Rupert. (1995, Jul.). Eyewash No Defense: Lasers Still Cause Concern. International Defense Review, 28, (7) 1.
[476] Pengelley, Rupert. (1994, Apr.). Wanted: a watch on non-le thal Weap ons. International Defense Review, 27, (4) 1.
[477] Penneys, N.S. (1971, Jan.-Feb.). Contact dermatitis due to chloroacetophenone. Federation Proceedings, 30.
[478] Penneys, N.S. et al. (1969, Aug.). Contact dermatitis due to o-chloroacetophenone and chemical mace. The New England Journal of Medicine, 281.
[479] Peters, D.W.A. (1969, Oct.). Delivery of Anti- Riot Agents, Final Report No. 69-17. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Limited War Laboratory.
[480] Pexton, Patrick. (1995, 17 Jul.). Shoot-- but not to kill: Major U.S. study pushes use of nonle thal Weap ons. Navy Times, 32. Marine Corps Edition.
[481] Pilant, Lois. (1996, Mar.). Innovative Weap onry. The Police Chief, 63, (3) 36-42.
[482] Pilant, Lois. (1993, May.). Spotlight on... Selecting Nonle thal Weap ons. The Police Chief, 60, (5) 45-55.
[483] Pine, A. (1993, 19 Dec.). Pentagon pushing nonle thal Weap ons. The Virginian-Pilot and the Ledger-Star, A1. First published in Los Angeles Times on 18 Dec.
[484] The Police Chief. (1988, Aug.). Models for Management: Non-le thal Electronic Restraint Weap ons, 55, 79- 80.
[485] The Police Chief. (1987, Sep.). A Less-Than- le thal Alternative (Handler 12 Grip Action Baton). 54, 79.
[486] Pope, Canadian Forces. Maj. Stephen R. (1995, Jun.). Nonle thality and Peace Operations. Thesis. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: U.S. Army Command and General Staff College.
[487] Porton. (1959, declassified 1968, Jun.). Agents for riot control: the selection of T. 792 (o-chlorobenzal malononitrile) as a candidate agent to replace CN. Porton Tech. Paper 651.
[488] Porton. (1959, declassified 1968, Jun.). A study of the toxicity of CS. Porton Tech. Paper 672.
[489] Potok, Mark. (1996, 20 May.). Wanted: Weap ons that don't kill. USA Today, p. A3.
[490] Proceedings. (1966). Navy defends non-le thal war gas, 92.
[491] Punte, C.L. & Owens, E.J. 1960, Feb.). The physiological effectiveness of CS in man with reference to aerosol particle size. U.S. Army Chemical Warfare Laboratories Tech. Memo. CWL-TM-24- 28.
[492] Purser, B.J. (n.d.). CR Decontamination Trial. Program No. 23/71. Field Trial Report No. 27. Porton Down, Salsbury Wilts, England: Chemical Defense Establishment.
[493] Queen and Stander. (1941, Nov.). Allergic dermatitis following exposure to tear gas (chloracetophenone, CN). The Journal of the American Medical Association, 117.
[494] Quimby, Freeman H. (1968, Jan.). The State of Technology in Nonle thal Guns. Washington, District of Columbia: Legislative Reference Service.
[495] Rapaport, Gary S. (1994, Feb.). Use of Deadly Force Against Suspects with Aerosol Weap ons: Some Preliminary Guidelines. Chief's Council. The Police Chief, 10.
[496] Reinnagel, Richard E. (1968). Considerations in the Use of Irritants in Law Enforcement. Buffalo, New York: Weap ons Research Department, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Inc.
[497] Rengstorff, R.H. (1969, Mar.). The effects of the riot control agent CS on visual activity. Military Medicine, 134.
[498] Richardson, Odie B. (1969). CS Munitions: Dispenser and Bagged Riot Control Agent, Helicopter, CS2, XM28: Final Report. San Francisco, California: Department of the Army, Army Concept Team in Vietnam. Project Number: ACG-83- 86.7/61.
[499] Ricks, T.E. (1993, 5 Jan.). A kinder, gentler war may be in order. Globe and Mail, 1. Toronto, Canada.
[500] Ricks, T.E. (1993, 4 Jan.). Nonle thal arms: new class of Weap ons could incapacitate foe yet limit casualties. Wall Street Journal, 1.
[501] Ritsche, Daniel F. (1993). "Mace" and Tear Gas Weap ons. Wisconsin Briefs from the Legislative Reference Bureau, Brief 93-3. Madison, Wisconsin: Legislative Reference Bureau.
[502] Rivetti, Dominick J. (1987). What is the Future of Less Than le thal Weap ons in Law Enforcement? Sacramento, California: State of California, Peace Officer Standards and Training.
[503] Roberts, Clifford. (1966). Nonle thal Agents in Limited War. Thesis. Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air Command and Staff College.
[504] Rodwin, Robert. (1973, 27 Sep.). How dangerous is the Army's squawk box? New Scientist, 59, (865) 730.
[505] Roos, John G. (1996, Jul.). Nowhere to Hide: High- Tech Counter-Sniper Systems Unmask Urban Terrorists. Armed Forces Journal International, 123, (12) 18.
[506] Roos, John G. (1987, Dec.). Protecting Our Vitals: A Sticky Response to Terrorists. Armed Forces Journal International, 124 (5) 32.
[507] Rose, S. & Smith, R. (1969, Sep.). CS- a case for concern. The New Scientist.
[508] Rosenberg, Barbara Hatch. (1994, Sep.-Oct.). "Non-le thal" Weap ons may violate treaties. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 50, (5) 44-45.
[509] Rosenberg, Eric. (1995, 6 Mar.). Pentagon Memo Seeks To Better Explain Non-le thal Weap onry. Defense Week, 16, 5.
[510] Rosenhead, J. & Smith, P.J. (1971, 12 Aug.). Ulster Riot Control: A Warning. New Scientist, 374.
[511] Rosenhead, Jonathan. (1976, 16 Dec.). A new look at less 'less le thal' Weap ons. New Scientist, 672-674.
[512] Rothberg, S. (1970, Jul.). Skin sensitization potential of the riot control agents BBC, DM, CN and CS on guinea pigs. Military Medicine. Also published as Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report 4219.
[513] Rothstein, Linda. (1994, Mar.-Apr.). The "soft-kill" solution. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 50, (2) 4-6.
[514] Rothstein, Linda. (1992, Jun.). More road blocks to chemical treaty? Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 48, 7.
[515] Runions, Bradley. (1996, Jan.-Feb.). Less-le thal Weap ons in Peace Operations: Broadening the Spectrum of Response. Peacekeeping and International Relations, 25, (1) 8-10.
[516] Sagalyn, Arnold & Coates, Joseph F. (1967, 17 Sep.). Wanted: Weap ons That Do Not Kill. New York Times Magazine.
[517] Samuels, D.W., Egner, D.O. & Campbell, D. (1969). Riot Control: Analysis and Catalog, Final Report, Report No. 69-14. Aberdeen Proving Ground: U.S. Army Land Warfare Laboratory, Research Analysis Branch.
[518] Sapolsky, Harvey M. (1995, Mar.). Non-le thal Warfare Technologies: Opportunities and Problems. Defense and Arms Control Studies Program Working Paper. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Center for International Studies, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
[519] The San Diego Union-Tribune. (1995, 13 Oct.). Army told to scrap laser that can blind.
[520] The San Diego Union-Tribune. (1995, 21 Sep.). Blinding laser shelved by U.S. Special Operations, A-12.
[521] Sapolsky, Harvey M. & Weiner, Sharon K. (1994, Oct.). War Without Casualties. Across the Board, 31, (9) 39- 42. [522] Saunders, Carol Silverman. (1995, Feb.). Future Firearms. OMNI, 17, (5) 31.
[523] Savitz, D. (1966, Mar.). Gas and guerrillas-- A word of caution. The New Republic.
[524] Scannell, Dr. Edward P. (1994, Dec.). Nonle thal Technologies Overview. Presentation Slides for Sixth Annual SO/LIC Symposium and Exhibition, Washington, DC. Dec. 14-16, 1994. US Army Research Laboratory, Weap ons Technology Directorate. Adelphi, Maryland.
[525] Schmidt, Donald et al. (1994, 3 Mar.). Water-based Non-stick Hydrophobic Coatings. Nature, 368, (6466), 39.
[526] Schmitt, Eric. (1995, 15 Feb.). Now, to the Shores of Somalia With Beanbag Guns and Goo. The New York Times International, A10.
[527] Scott, R. (1994). Offboard Countermeasures Technology Part 1: Soft Kill Payloads Get Smarter. Naval Forces, 15, (4) 16.
[528] Scott, William B. (1995, 16 Oct.). Panel's report backs nonle thal Weap ons. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 143, (16) 50-51.
[529] Security Planning Corporation. (1972, Mar.). Non-le thal Weap ons for Law Enforcement: Research Needs and Priorities. A Report to National Science Foundation, PB 209 635. Washington, District of Columbia.
[530] Senior Advisory Group for Low-Collateral, Less- Than-le thal Weap ons. (1994, May.). Columbus, Ohio: RACIC Battelle Memorial Institute.
[531] Serwer, Andrew E. (1994, 4 Apr.). Crime Stoppers Make a Killing. Fortune, 129, (7) 109-111.
[532] Shallice, T. (1973). The Ulster depth interrogation techniques and their relation to sensory deprivation research. Cognition, 1, 385-405.
[533] Shank, Ellsworth B. et al. (1974, Jun.). A Comparison of Various Less le thal Projectiles. Technical Report No. 74- 79. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: US Army Land Warfare Laboratory.
[534] Shannon, James O. (1996, 10 May.). A Report of the Nonle thal (NLW) Coordination Project. Conducted by Los Alamos National Laboratory at the United States Atlantic Command under the auspices of the Joint Program Office for Special Technology Countermeasures.
[535] Shorto, Russel. (1995, Mar.). Armageddon: killing them softly. Gentlemen's Quarterly, 65, 152.
[536] Silverstone, A. (1970, Dec.). Le thal use of non- le thal Weap ons. Paper submitted at the International Meeting of Scientists on Chemical Warfare in Vietnam, Orsay.
[537] Smith, Senator Bob. (1996, Jun.). Appropriate Response: Nontraditional Missions Demand Less-Than-le thal Weap ons. Armed Forces Journal International, 133, (11), 55.
[538] Smith & Wesson Chemical Company. (1965). Police Riot Control Training Manual. Rock Creek, Ohio.
[539] Sprang, W.O. (1965, Nov.). Nonle thal Incapacitating Weap on: Extensible Billy Club. Technical Paper No. RAC- TP-194 submitted to Advanced Research Projects Agency, Washington D.C. McLean Virginia: Research Analysis Report.
[540] Stanton, USA. LtCol. Martin N. (1996, Nov.). Nonle thal Weap ons: Can of Worms. U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 122, (11) 58-60.
[541] Stanton, USA. LtCol. Martin N. (1996, Jan.). What Price Sticky Foam? U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings, 122, (1) 58-60. Reprinted in (1996, Aut.) Parameters, 26, (3) 63-68.
[542] Starr, Barbara. (1996, 6 Mar.). USA defines policy on non-le thal Weap ons. Jane's Defence Weekly.
[543] Starr, Barbara. (1994, 31 Oct.). USA tries to make war less le thal. Jane's Defence Weekly, 10.
[544] Starr, Barbara. (1994, Jul.). Pentagon Maps Non- le thal Options. International Defense Review, 27, (7) 30, 32.
[545] Starr, Barbara. (1994, 30 Apr.). USA studies non- le thal Weap on priorities. Jane's Defence Weekly, 14.
[546] Starr, Barbara. (1993, Apr.). Non-le thal Weap on puzzle for US Army. International Defense Review, 26, (4) 319-320.
[547] Steadman, Nick. (1996, May.). Nonle thal Weap onry. S.W.A.T., 60.
[548] Steele, David. (1995, Mar.). Guns for Raids and Riot Control. Gun World, 35, (8).
[549] Stefanye, David. (1971, 2 Nov.). Less le thal Weap ons for the Civil Disturbance Control Mission. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Army Materiel Command.
[550] Stiner, Carl et al. (1994, May.). Report of the Senior Working Group on Military Operations Other Than War (OOTW). Contract No. MDA972-93-C-0016. Advanced Research Projects Agency.
[551] Stolfi, R.H. et al. (1973, Mar.). Gradient and Less le thal Devices in Control of Urban Violence. Report No. 1635. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Ballistic Research Laboratories.
[552] Stratbucker, Robert A. (1989, 4 Aug.). Evaluation of the Ultron II Electronic Stun Device. Unpublished. University of Nebraska Medical Center.
[553] Striker, G.E. et al. (1967, Jan.). A clinico- pathologic study of the effects of riot control agents on monkeys: IV CS grenade. Edgewood Arsenal, MD: Edgewood Arsenal Technical Report. 4071 AD 808732.
[554] Stuck, Monte. (1972). Future U.S. Use of Non- le thal Chemical Agents in Warfare. Staff Study. Norfolk, Virginia: Armed Forces Staff College.
[555] Sunday Telegraph Reporter. (1973, 6 Oct.). New riot gas condemned (CR).
[556] Sweetman, Sherri. (1987, Mar.). Report on the Attorney General's Conference on Less Than le thal Weap ons. National Institute of Justice. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[557] Swett, Charles. (1995, Jan.). Nonle thal Weap ons section. Review Essay: War and Anti-War. Special Warfare, 8, (1) 29.
[558] Swett, Charles F. (1994, 28 Nov.). Draft Non- le thal Weap ons Policy. Briefing Slides. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Special Operations/Low Intensity Conflict, Policy Planning. Washington, District of Columbia.
[559] Swett, Charles F. (1994, 21 Jul.). Draft Policy for Non-le thal Weap ons. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Special Operations/Low Intensity Conflict, Policy Planning. Washington, District of Columbia.
[560] Swett, Charles F. (1993, 9 Nov.). Strategic Assessment: Non-le thal Weap ons. Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict, Policy Planning. Washington, District of Columbia. Draft report.
[561] Tactical Technologies. (1995, 3 Feb.). Non- le thal Weap ons Offer New SO/LIC Capabilities, 5.
[562] Tapscott, Mark & Atwal, Kay. (1993, Feb.). New Weap ons that win without killing on DOD's horizon; policy strife in Pentagon may slow work on devices that could give the president more options in a crisis. Defense Electronics, 25, (2) 41-46.
[563] Tapscott, M. (1993, Apr.). The non-le thal Weap ons battle. Defence, 37.
[564] Tapscott, Mark. (1993, Dec.). Reno Asks Aspin for Non-le thal, Other DOD Weap ons to Fight Crime. Defense Electronics, 25, 8.
[565] Tatum, Chris. (1995, Mar.). Defensive Weap ons Do's and Don'ts. Security Management, 26-31.
[566] Technology Beat. (1995, Sep.). New Technologies Demonstrated for Law Enforcement, 2-4.
[567] Technology Review. (1995, Jan.). Trends, 98, (1) 14.
[568] Tengroth, Bjorn M. (1993, Sep.). Laser Weap ons Designed to Produce Blindness. Editorial. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 116, (3) 370.
[569] Tennenbaum, Abraham N. & Moore, Angela M. (1993, Sep.-Oct.). Non-le thal Weap ons: Alternatives to Deadly Force. The Futurist, 27, (5) 20-23.
[570] The, Liang. (1995, Aug.). Getting the Act Together: Hardkill-Softkill Co-Ordination for Littoral Waters. International Defense Review, 28, (8) 54-56.
[571] Thein, B.K. et al. (1976, Jan.). Weap on Performance Testing and Analysis: The Modi-Pac Round, the No. 4 Lead-Shot Round, and the Flying Baton. Technical Memorandum 4-76. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory.
[572] Thein, B.K., Shank, E.B. & Wargovich, M.J. (1974, May). Analysis of a Bean-Bag-Type Projectile as a Less le thal Weap on. Draft Report. Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland: U.S. Army Land Warfare Laboratory.
[573] Thomas, Bob & Means, Randy. (1990, Jul.). Objective Reasonableness Standard for Use of Non Deadly Force Established. The Police Chief, 45.
[574] Thorpe, Terry. (1990, Mar.). Clearing the Way to Distraction Devices. Law Enforcement Technology, 16.
[575] Tigner, Brooks. (1996, 29 Apr.). Alliance Study Urges Nations to Collaborate on Weap ons (non-le thals), Defense News, 11, (17) 12.
[576] Tigner, Brooks. (1994, 11-17 Jul.). NATO Eyes Peacekeeping Tools. Defense News, 9, 4.
[577] Tillman, A.C. (1994, Jan.). Weap ons for the 21st century soldier. International Defense Review, 27, (1) 37-38.
[578] Time. (1989, Jan.). Nonle thal bullets that kill (rubber-clad metal balls used by Israelis to quell Palestinian uprising), 133, 33.
[579] Trebor Corporation International. (n.d.) Stun-Gun Preliminary Terminal Effects Study. Dublin, California.
[580] Trostle, L.C. (1990). The force continuum: From le thal to less-than-le thal force. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 6, (1) 23-36.
[581] Truong, Khong Q. (1985, Sep.). Evaluation of the MS Disperser as a Dissemination Device for Thickened Liquid Chemical Agent Stimulant. CRDC-TC 84076. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Armament, Munitions and Chemical Command, Chemical Research and Development Center.
[582] USA Today. (1995, Apr.). New High-Tech Tools Aid Police, 123, 14-15.
[583] United States Army. (1996, Aug.). FM 311, Riot Control Agents, Herbicide Operations. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[584] United States Army. (1990, 12 Dec). FM 3-9, Military Chemical Compounds and Their Properties. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[585] United States Army. (1985, Nov.). FM 19-15, Civil Disturbance. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[586] US Army ARDEC. (1995, 2 Jun.). Grenade Stun Nonle thal Weap on XM84. Issue No. PSA-1359. Commerce Business Daily, 3.
[587] U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1982). Army Equipment Data Sheets: Chemical Weap ons and Munitions. Technical Manual; TM 43-0001-26-2. Washington, District of Columbia: Headquarters, Department of the Army.
[588] U.S. Air Force Armament Laboratory. (1967). CBU- 30/A Incapacitating Munitions Systems. AFATL-TR-67-178.
[589] U.S. Air Force Armament Laboratory. (1966). Design and Development of an Incapacitating Disseminator. ATL-TR-66- 40.
[590] U.S. Air Force Tactical Air Command. (1969). ROC for Non-le thal Area Denial System. TAC-ROC-45-69. Langley Air Force Base, Virginia.
[591] U.S. Army Engineering Laboratory (HEL). (1981, 7-9 Dec. & 1982, 12-15 Jan.). An Acoustical Assessment of the Impulse Noise of Grenade Simulators Exploding in Enclosures. Aberdeen, Maryland: Aberdeen Proving Grounds.
[592] U.S. Army Foreign Science and Technology Center. (1990). Incapacitating Agents, European Communist Countries. AST- 162OR-100-90. Charlottesville, Maryland.
[593] U.S. Army Laboratory Command. (1988, Mar.). Warfighting with Emerging Technologies: Report on the Tech Base War Games. Waterways Experiment Station.
[594] U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering Center. (1992, 23 Sep.). Low Collateral Damage Munitions (LCDM) Programs. Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey.
[595] U.S. Army Research Laboratory. (1993). Less- than-le thal Weap ons Development for Law Enforcement. ARL-TR-51. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.
[596] U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC). (1992, 4 Sep.). Operations Concept for Disabling Measures. Pamphlet 525-XX, Draft.
[597] U.S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Subcommittee on National Security Policy and Scientific Develop- ments. (1970). Chemical-biological warfare: U.S. policies and international effects report with an appended study on the use of tear gas in war:...pursuant to House Resolution 143. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[598] U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment. (1972, 26- 27 Jul.). Prohibiting military weather modification. 92nd. Cong., 2nd Sess.
[599] U.S. Department of the Army. (1969, 9 Apr.). Employment of riot control agents, flame, smoke, antiplant agents, and personnel detectors in counterguerrilla operations. Training Circular 3-16.
[600] U.S. Government Printing Office. An Act to Authorize the Export-Import Bank of the United States to Provide Financing for the Export of Nonle thal Defense Articles and Defense Services the Primary End Use of Which Will Be for Civilian Purposes. (1995). Washington, District of Columbia.
[601] U.S. Special Operations Command & Advanced Research Projects Agency. (1995, 29 Dec.). Survey of Limited Effects Weap ons, Munitions, and Devices. 2nd Edition. MacDill Air Force Base, Florida.
[602] U.S. News & World Report. (1992, 28 Sep.). A guide to self-defense devices, 88.
[603] Vasishtha, Ph.D., Niraj & Bera, Cristin S. (1995, 10 Jul.). Marking and Incapacitating a Fleeing Target (MIFT) using Non-le thal Encapsulated Compounds, Volume I: Technical Proposal. Prepared for ARPA/ASTO, Southwest Research Institute.
[604] Wade, Nicholas. (1972, 9 Jun.). Technology in Ulster: Rubber Bullets Hit Home, Brainwashing Backfires. Science, 176, 1102-1106.
[605] Walker, Sam. (1994, 6 Sep.). 'Nonle thal' Weap ons, James Bond Style. The Christian Science Monitor, 12.
[606] Wall Street Journal. (1994, 2 Aug.). Nonle thal Weap ons: Freeze., or I'll Fire My Sticky-Goo Gun, 1.
[607] Wall Street Journal. (1993, 4 Jan.). New Class of Weap ons Could Incapacitate Foe Yet Limit Casualties, 1.
[608] Walsh, Don. (1985). The Ring Airfoil Grenade: A Miracle Munition The Army Ignores. Gung-Ho/Special Weap ons, 20-25.
[609] Warden III, USAF. Col. John. (1994, Dec.). Non le thal Concepts of Operation. Presented at Sixth Annual SO/LIC-CD Symposium and Exhibition, Washington, District of Columbia. Draft.
[610] Wargovich et al. (1975, Sep.). Evaluation of the Physiological Effects of a Rubber Bullet, a Baseball, and a Flying Baton. Technical Memorandum 24-75. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Human Engineering Laboratory.
[611] Washington Post. (1994, 23 Mar.). Pentagon, Justice Dept. Set Plans for Sharing of Nonle thal Technology, A3.
[612] Weap ons Systems Concept Office, Development and Engineering Directorate. (1975, Oct.). Soft/Sting Ring Airfoil Grenade Civil Disturbance Control System; Concise Summary Description. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.
[613] Weap ons Systems Concept Office, Development and Engineering Directorate. (1975, Apr.). Development Plan for Soft Ring Airfoil Munitions System--Revision C. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.
[614] Weigand, D.A. (1969). Cutaneous reaction to the riot control agent CS. Military Medicine, 134.
[615] Weiner, J.T. et al. (1960). A study of the acute and subacute toxicity of aerosols of CS in small laboratory animals. Edgewood Arsenal, MD: Edgewood Arsenal Chemical Warfare Laboratory. 2360.
[616] Weiner, Malcolm H. and Boyd, David. (1996, Sum.). Forum: Nonle thal Weap ons. Issues in Science and Technology, 12, (4) 12-13.
[617] Weiner, Malcolm H., chairman. (1995). Nonle thal Technologies: Military Options and Implications. Report of an Independent Task Force. New York, New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
[618] Weinschenk, A. (1993, 24 Nov.). Non-le thal Weap ons group set to form in March. Defense Weekly, 14, (46) 1.
[619] Weinschenk, A. (1993, 16 Feb.). Boosters again are pushing for "Office of Non-le thality." Defense Weekly, 2.
[620] Weiss, D.R., Brandt, D.J. & Tweet, K.D. (n.d.). Smart Gun Technology Requirements Preliminary Report. Contract IAA- 94-IJ-R-021. Albuquerque, New Mexico: Sandia National Laboratories.
[621] Westbrook, E.E. & Williams, L.W. (1971, 30 Apr.). A Brief Survey of Nonle thal Weap ons. Report No. RACIC- TR-66, sponsored by ARPA Order No. 1509. Columbus, Ohio: RACIC Battelle Memorial Institute.
[622] Westing, Arthur W. (1990, Feb.). Use of Chemical Weap ons Illegal? Letter to the Editor. Military Review, 70, (2) 82-83.
[623] Williams, Robert H. (1993, Oct.). Non-le thal Devices Slice Across Science Spectrum. National Defense, 78, (491) 25.
[624] Wilsnack, Richard W. et al. (1971, Mar.) Comprehensive Law and Order Assistance Research and Development (CLOARAD) Program, Technical Report No. 71-04. Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland: U.S. Army Land Warfare Laboratory.
[625] Witten, Benjamin. (1965). Non-le thal Agents for Denial of Terrain in Limited Warfare Situations. Edgewood Arsenal, Maryland: U.S. Army Edgewood Arsenal, Chemical Research and Development Laboratories.
[626] Wolfowitz, Paul. (1991, 10 Mar.). Do We Need a Non le thal Defense Initiative? Memorandum to the Secretary of Defense. USD(P).
[627] Wright, Robin. (1995, 6 Sep.). Iraqis Admit to Broad, Virulent Germ War Plan. Los Angeles Times, A1, A11.
[628] York, Ken C, Gourley, Scott, & Arsentein, Seth. (1993, 3 Feb.). Non-le thal Weap ons Offer New SO/LIC Capabilities. Tactical Technology, 1-5.
[629] Yost, James Michael. (1993). Non-le thal Weap ons: A Study of Effectiveness in Reducing Injuries and Brutality Complaints. Thesis. Virginia Commonwealth University.
[630] Zaloga, S. (1990, May.). Soviets close to deploying battlefield beam Weap ons. Armed Forces Journal International.
[631] Zekri, A.M.B. et al. (1995, Dec.). Acute Mass Burns Caused By O-Chlorobenzylidene Malononitrile (CS) Tear Gas. Burns, 21, (8) 586-589.
[632] Aviation Week & Space Technology. (1994, 24 Jan.). NATO's Peek: Nonle thal Weap ons. 140, (4) 33.
[633] Bunker, Robert J. (1996, Spr.). Generations, Waves and Epochs: Modes of Warfare and the RPMA. Airpower Journal, 10 23-25.
[634] Bunker, Robert J. (1996, Sum.). Ricochets and Replies: RPMA Update. Airpower Journal, 10 3, 117.
[635] Bunker, Robert J. (1997). Grenades, launched, Allied and DRV, Spencer C. Tucker, ed. The Vietnam War: An Encyclopedia. New York, New York: Garland Publishing.
[636] Cooper, Pat. (1995, 20-26 Mar.). Naval Research Lab Attempts to Meld Neurons and Chips: Studies May Produce Army of 'Zombies.' Defense News, 10, 1, 50.
[637] Hay, Jr. John H. (1974). Tactical and Materiel Innovations. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Government Printing Office.
[638] Linder, US Army. Maj. James B. (1996, Sept.-Oct.). A Case for Employing Nonle thal Weap ons. Military Review, 76, (5) 25-29.
[639] Marine Corps com bat Development Command. (1996, 20- 21 Aug.). Proceedings of the Non-le thal Modeling and Simulation Workshop. Hosted by Non le thal Weap ons Program & Non le thal Coordination Cell. Quantico, Virginia.
[640] Metz, Steven & Kievit, James. (1995, 27 Jun.). Strategy and the Revolution in Military Affairs. Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania: U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute.
[641] Office of the Judge Advocate General. (1995, 6 Feb.). Legal Review of Barrier Foam. Alexandria, Virginia: Department of the Navy.
[642] Rauss, Patrick J. et al. (1996, 23-25 Jul.). FERET (Face-Recognition Technology) Recognition Algorithms in Proceedings of the Fifth Automatic Target Recognizer System and Technology Symposium. Sponsored by the Automatic Target Recognizer Working Group.
[643] Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology. (1996, 22 Mar.). Nonle thal Weap ons (NLW) Program Implementation. Memo.
[644] U.S. Department of Justice. (1996, Oct.). High- Speed Pursuit: New Technologies Around the Corner. National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center Bulletin, 1-6.
Lieutenant General Tad J. Oelstrom, Superintendent
Brigadier General Ruben A. Cubero, Dean of the Faculty
Major General Thomas H. Neary, Director
Colonel Thomas D. Miller, Chief, Policy Division
Lieutenant Colonel Peter L. Hays, Director
Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey A. Larsen, Editor
Major Vincent J. Jodoin, Editor
Ms Marsha Taylor, Cover Design
Comments pertaining to this paper are invited and should be forwarded to:
Director, USAF Institute for National Security Studies
HQ USAFA/DFES
2354 Fairchild Drive, Suite 5L27
USAF Academy, CO 80840
phone: 719-333-2717
fax: 719-333-2716
email: hayspl.dfe@usafa.af.mil
Visit the Institute for National Security Studies home page at http://www.usafa.af.mil/inss
Dr Robert J. Bunker is an adjunct professor, National Security Studies program, California State University, San Bernardino, and professor, Unconventional Warfare, American Military University, Manassas Park, Virginia. His research focus is on the influence of technology on warfare and political organization and on the national security implications of emerging modes of warfare. He served as a concept assessor to the US Air Force Project 2025 study.
The editor would like to thank the following individuals in addition to those listed on the next page for their contributions to this work: Dr Glenn W. Goodman, Jr., Dr Mark T. Clark, Amy Wittman, and Scott Boris, as well as the institutional support of Armed Forces Journal International and Defense News.
Dr John B. Alexander is a retired Army Colonel with assignments ranging from command of Special Forces A-Teams in Thailand and Vietnam to Directorship of the Advanced Systems Concepts Office, U.S. Army Laboratory Command. From 1992-1995 he was the Program Manager for Nonle thal Defense, Special Technologies Group, NonPro lifer ation and Inter- national Security Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory. He currently holds many positions including that of US Delegate to a NATO Advisory Group.
Col Rex Applegate is a retired Army officer whose career in unconventional warfare included assignments with the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), Military Police and Counterintelligence. He is a recognized international authority on nonle thal Weap ons having been involved in projects relating to their development during the period 1960-75. His book on riot control is considered the principle work in this subject area by many police forces.
Mr Jon B. Becker <./B>is the CEO & President of Aardvark Tactical, Inc., a California based provider of less-le thal munitions and training. His business was the primary contractor for less-le thal munitions and training for Operation United Shield in Somalia.
Lt Col Matt Begert, USMC, is the Military Assistant to the Director, Precision Guided Weap ons Countermeasures Test and Evaluation Directorate, an OSD field activity. His operational experience includes instructor duty for the A-6 Intruder, extensive deployment to the Pacific and operations as a small team leader attached to US Army and allied special operations units for interoperable fire support. Expeditionary experience includes aircraft carrier deployment in the Indian Ocean and air operations in the Persian Gulf War.
Mr Jaime H. Cuadros is the founder of Arts and Engineering, a firm dedicated to the study and development of less-le thal kinetic energy projectiles and Weap ons; together with the art of watercolor painting. Arts and Engineering has designed improved shotbags (for the 12 gauge shotgun) and a 19 mm close-range rubber bullet system for police use.
Mr Abraham Flatau, formerly Chief of Weap ons Systems Concepts Team, US Army Armament Research and Development Command. Conceived and directed research and development projects in unconventional Weap onry, including Ring Airfoil Grenade (RAG) and tubular projectiles. From 1984 to 1988 served as technical advisor to Director, Advanced Systems and Technology Division, Aerojet Ordnance Company.
CWO-5 Charles "Sid" Heal, USMCR, saw service in the Vietnam and Persian Gulf Wars and was the Mobile Training Team leader for nonle thal options in Operation United Shield in Somalia. He has over 22 years of law enforcement experience and is a national authority on diversionary devices and a court recognized expert in law enforcement special operations and emergency management.